Job turnover intentions among pharmacy faculty

被引:49
作者
Conklin, Mark H. [1 ]
Desselle, Shane P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duquesne Univ, Sch Pharm, Bayer Learning Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15282 USA
关键词
faculty; job turnover intentions; employment; institutional support;
D O I
10.5688/aj710462
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objectives. To determine the primary reasons why pharmacy faculty intend to remain or leave their current institution and why they left their most recent academic institution, and the relative contribution of various organizational and individual characteristics toward explaining variance in turnover intentions. Methods. A survey instrument was e- mailed to pharmacy faculty members asking respondents to indicate up to 5 reasons for their intentions and up to 5 reasons why they left a previous institution. The survey also elicited perceptions on quality of work life in addition to demographic and institutional data, upon which turnover intentions were regressed using a forward- conditional procedure. Organizational commitment as a moderator of turnover intentions was regressed over the remaining variables not acting directly on employer intentions. Results. Just over 1 in 5 respondents indicated intentions to leave their current academic institution. Excessive workload, seeking a new challenge, poor salary, and poor relationships with college or school administrators were frequently cited as reasons for leaving. Turnover intentions are influenced directly by department chair support and organizational commitment, which moderates various support and satisfaction variables. Conclusions. Pharmacy faculty members' decision to remain or leave an institution is dependent upon developing a sense of commitment toward the institution. Commitment is facilitated by support from the institution and department chair, in addition to a sense of satisfaction with the teaching environment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Aguirre A., 1994, INITIATIVES, V56, P41
  • [2] *AM ASS COLL PHARM, 2004, AM ASS COLL PHARM RO
  • [3] *AM ASS COLL PHARM, 2005, I RES SER 2005 2006
  • [4] A qualitative method for assessing faculty satisfaction
    Ambrose, S
    Huston, T
    Norman, M
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2005, 46 (07) : 803 - 830
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2006, ACADEME
  • [6] Understanding the training needs of department chairs
    Aziz, S
    Mullins, ME
    Balzer, WK
    Grauer, E
    Burnfield, JL
    Lodato, MA
    Cohen-Powless, MA
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2005, 30 (05) : 571 - 593
  • [7] Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia
    Barnes, LLB
    Agago, MO
    Coombs, WT
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1998, 39 (04) : 457 - 469
  • [8] BESS JL, 1992, HIGHER ED HDB THEORY
  • [9] BODE RK, 1999, FACULTY NEW JOBS
  • [10] BODE RK, 1995, HIGH ED C NAT ED ASS