Constructing and Exploiting Software Metrics Networks For Software Quality Assessment

被引:0
作者
Gu, Sungdo [1 ]
Kim, So Yeon [2 ]
Jeong, Hyun-Hwan [2 ]
Sohn, Kyung-Ah [2 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ, Dept Software Engn, Suwon, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Dept Informat & Comp Engn, Suwon, South Korea
来源
2015 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IT CONVERGENCE AND SECURITY (ICITCS) | 2015年
关键词
software quality; software metrics; feature selection; mutual information; maximal information coefficient; Pearson correlation coefficient; Poisson regression; FEATURE-SELECTION; INFORMATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Software quality is one of the important aspects of the reliable software. For this reason, software practitioners are interested in the methods that enable to predict defect with software metrics. Most studies focus on what kind of techniques would be fit for the prediction model; however, the research about what is the appropriate number of software metrics for building effective defect prediction model are relatively infrequent. In this paper, we propose a new approach for selecting a subset of software metrics by exploiting the correlation structure among them. We construct software metrics networks with two different relationship measures of MIC ( Maximal Information Coefficient) and Pearson correlation coefficient. We then adjust the threshold for filtering out edges with weak correlation, and select representative features for each of the resulting connected components. We validate this subset selection approach with the Poisson regression model. Our results demonstrate that metrics selection using networks with relationship coefficient is efficient enough compared to model with the full set of features.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Quantifying Colocalization by Correlation: The Pearson Correlation Coefficient is Superior to the Mander's Overlap Coefficient [J].
Adler, Jeremy ;
Parmryd, Ingela .
CYTOMETRY PART A, 2010, 77A (08) :733-742
[2]   Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient [J].
Ahlgren, P ;
Jarneving, B ;
Rousseau, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 54 (06) :550-560
[3]  
Akalya Devi C., 2012, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl, V2, P25, DOI [10.5121/ijcsa.2012.2203, DOI 10.5121/IJCSA.2012.2203]
[4]   Software testing research: Achievements, challenges, dreams [J].
Bertolino, Antonia .
FOSE 2007: FUTURE OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2007, :85-103
[5]  
Binder R. V., 1996, Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, V6, P125, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1689(199609/12)6:3/4<125::AID-STVR121>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-X
[7]  
C. Engineering, 2014, FEAT SUBS SEL US FIL, V2, P1350
[8]   A systematic review of software fault prediction studies [J].
Catal, Cagatay ;
Diri, Banu .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) :7346-7354
[9]  
Chawla S, 2013, INT J ADV COMPUT SC, V4, P161
[10]   A METRICS SUITE FOR OBJECT-ORIENTED DESIGN [J].
CHURCHER, NI ;
SHEPPERD, MJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1995, 21 (03) :263-265