A Multidimensional Analysis of Prostate Surgery Costs in the United States: Robotic-Assisted versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy

被引:25
|
作者
Bijlani, Akash [1 ]
Hebert, April E. [1 ]
Davitian, Mike [2 ,3 ]
May, Holly [2 ,3 ]
Speers, Mark [2 ,3 ]
Leung, Robert [4 ]
Mohamed, Nihal E. [4 ]
Sacks, Henry S. [5 ]
Tewari, Ashutosh [4 ]
机构
[1] Intuit Surg, Sunnyvale, CA USA
[2] Hlth Adv LLC, Weston, MA USA
[3] Hlth Adv LLC, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Urol, 1425 Madison Ave,6th Floor,Room L6-70, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Thomas C Chalmers Clin Trials Unit, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
cost-comparison analysis; economic; RALP; RRP; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; MESH FIXATION; CANCER; CARE; METAANALYSIS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: The economic value of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in the United States is still not well understood because of limited view analyses. Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the costs and benefits of RALP versus retropubic radical prostatectomy from an expanded view, including hospital, payer, and societal perspectives. Methods: We performed a model based cost comparison using clinical outcomes obtained from a systematic review of the published literature. Equipment costs were obtained from the manufacturer of the robotic system; other economic model parameters were obtained from government agencies, online resources, commercially available databases, an advisory expert panel, and the literature. Clinical point estimates and care pathways based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were used to model costs out to 3 years. Hospital costs and costs incurred for the patients' postdischarge complications, adjuvant and salvage radiation treatment, incontinence and potency treatment, and lost wages during recovery were considered. Robotic system costs were modeled in two ways: as hospital overhead (hospital overhead calculation: RALP-H) and as a function of robotic case volume (robotic amortization calculation: RALP-R). All costs were adjusted to year 2014 US dollars. Results: Because of more favorable clinical outcomes over 3 years, RALP provided hospital ($1094 savings with RALP-H, $341 deficit with RALP-R), payer ($1451), and societal ($1202) economic benefits relative to retropubic radical prostatectomy. Conclusions: Monte-Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated a 38% to 99% probability that RALP provides cost savings (depending on the perspective). Higher surgical consumable costs are offset by a decreased hospital stay, lower complication rate, and faster return to work.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 403
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of the robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Laviana, A. A.
    Hu, J. C.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2013, 65 (03) : 161 - 170
  • [2] Wound infection in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostate surgery: A meta-analysis
    Zhu, Wei
    Wu, Lingfeng
    Xie, Wenhua
    Zhang, Gaoyue
    Gu, Yanqin
    Hou, Yansong
    He, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (09) : 3550 - 3557
  • [3] Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Farnham, SB
    Webster, TM
    Herrell, SD
    Smith, JA
    UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (02) : 360 - 363
  • [4] Comparison of Robotic-assisted versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy Performed by a Single Surgeon
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    Yang, Chi-Rei
    Wang, John
    Cheng, Chen-Li
    Patel, Vipul R.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 29 (05) : 1637 - 1642
  • [5] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after aborted retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Kowalczyk K.J.
    Huang A.C.
    Williams S.B.
    Yu H.-Y.
    Hu J.C.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7 (3) : 301 - 304
  • [6] Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy
    Lorenz, Judith
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2022, 53 (03) : 220 - 220
  • [7] Robotic-assisted surgery and the evolution of the radical prostatectomy
    Anderson, K. M.
    Ruckle, H. C.
    Baldwin, D. D.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2012, 64 (02) : 97 - 122
  • [8] Predictors of costs for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Bolenz, Christian
    Gupta, Amit
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Lotan, Yair
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 29 (03) : 325 - 329
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience
    Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira
    Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães
    Thiago Camelo Mourão
    Ricardo de Lima Favaretto
    Thiago Borges Marques Santana
    Ademar Lopes
    Stenio de Cassio Zequi
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 859 - 868
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience
    de Oliveira, Renato Almeida Rosa
    Guimaraes, Gustavo Cardoso
    Mourao, Thiago Camelo
    de Lima Favaretto, Ricardo
    Santana, Thiago Borges Marques
    Lopes, Ademar
    de Cassio Zequi, Stenio
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (06) : 859 - 868