Borderline personality disorder and larger comfortable interpersonal distance in close relationships

被引:6
作者
Abdevali, Mostafa [1 ]
Mazaheri, Mohammad Ali [1 ]
Besharat, Mohammad Ali [2 ]
Zabihzadeh, Abbas [1 ]
Green, Jeffrey D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Behashti Univ, Dept Psychol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Dept Psychol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Psychol, Box 2018, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
关键词
Borderline personality disorder; Interpersonal distance; Physical distance; Personal space; Close relationships; ATTACHMENT; SENSITIVITY; SPACE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2021.111067
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Physical distance regulation in interpersonal communications is a key component of the quality of close relationships. This distance is regulated differently in various individuals and psychological states. Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) have been reported to prefer a larger distance. The present study aimed to compare the Healthy Controls (HC) (n = 40) and patients with BPD (n = 36) in terms of the comfortable interpersonal distance when facing different protagonists (including mother, love partner, close friend, childhood self-image and current self-image as significant others, as well as salesperson and thief). All participants in both groups completed modified computerized version of the comfortable interpersonal distance (CID) task in both the passive mode (when protagonists approached them) and the active mode (when they approached protagonists). We asked participants to determine the point at which they felt uncomfortable. The BPD group preferred a significantly larger interpersonal distance than the HC group with all protagonists except the salesperson. We discuss these results in the context of attachment theory.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Akbarian H., 2020, CURR PSYCHOL, V234, P1
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, VFourth
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, SCHEMA THERAPY
  • [4] Arntz A., 2017, Schema therapy in practice: An introductory guide to the schema mode approach
  • [5] ATTACHMENT AND REFLECTIVE FUNCTIONING IN WOMEN WITH BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER
    Badoud, Deborah
    Prada, Paco
    Nicastro, Rosetta
    Germond, Charlotte
    Luyten, Patrick
    Perroud, Nader
    Debbane, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2018, 32 (01) : 17 - 30
  • [6] A systematic review of the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and borderline personality disorder/traits
    Barazandeh, Hoda
    Kissane, David W.
    Saeedi, Naysun
    Gordon, Michael
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 94 : 130 - 139
  • [7] INTERPERSONAL THREAT SENSITIVITY IN BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER: AN EYE-TRACKING STUDY
    Bertsch, Katja
    Krauch, Marlene
    Stopfer, Katharina
    Haeussler, Katrin
    Herpertz, Sabine C.
    Gamer, Matthias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2017, 31 (05) : 647 - 670
  • [8] Bowlby J., 1982, ATTACHMENT LOSS VOL, V1
  • [9] Bretherton I., 2008, Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, P102
  • [10] Dimaggio G., 2015, METACOGNITIVE INTERP