共 21 条
Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis
被引:20
作者:
Gomez, Francisco
[1
]
Brea, Gisbeli
[1
]
Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco
[1
]
机构:
[1] Cent Univ Venezuela, Postgrad Dept Endodont, Caracas, Venezuela
关键词:
Mandibular second molar;
Anatomical variation;
C-shaped canals;
Radix Paramolaris;
CBCT;
POPULATION;
ANATOMY;
SYSTEM;
PREVALENCE;
2ND-MOLARS;
D O I:
10.1186/s12903-021-01787-7
中图分类号:
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号:
1003 ;
摘要:
Background The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical variations of the root canal system of mandibular second molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods 190 mandibular second molars cone-beam computed tomography images were reviewed. The evaluation was performed by a radiologist with endodontic experience and two endodontists trained with CBCT technology. Tooth position, number of root and root canals, C-shaped root canal system configuration, presence of extra root (radix), and radicular grooves were assessed. Data was statistically analyzed using The Chi-square test (alpha = 0,05) to determine any significant difference between gender and the total number of root and root canals, and any significant difference between gender and root canal anatomical variation. Results Overall, 85.5% showed two separated roots, 12.1% a single root, 2.6% three roots or radix. 87.7% showed three root canals, 12.1% two root canals, 2.6% four root canals, and 1.6% a single root canal. 10% showed a single foramen, 75.3% two foramina, 13.6% three foramina and 1% showed four foramina.19.5% showed C-shaped anatomical variation, 51.4% in male patients, 48.6% in female patients. According to Fan classification: C1 13.6% in cervical third, C2 10% in the middle third, C3 17.3% in middle third, 15.5% in apical third, and C4 12.7% in the apical third. Root canals number in these samples were 5.4% a single canal, 21.6% two canals, 70.3% three canals, and 2.7% four canals. The root showed 46% with one foramen, 46% two foramina, and 8% three foramina. Radicular grooves 83.3% were found in the lingual area and 16.2% towards the buccal area. Conclusions The most prevalent anatomic presentation of the evaluated sample was a mandibular second molars with two roots, three root canals, and two apical foramina. Their variation was C-shaped root canals and Radix Paramolaris.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文