Large-scale load capacity tests on a geosynthetic encased column

被引:58
作者
Alkhorshid, Nima R. [1 ]
Araujo, Gregorio L. S. [2 ]
Palmeira, Ennio M. [2 ]
Zornberg, Jorge G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Itajuba, Inst Integrated Engn, BR-35903087 Itabira, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Brasilia, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, BR-70910900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Civil Architectural & Environm Engn Dept, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Geosynthetics; Embankment; Soft soil; Geotextile; Large-scale test; Encased column; STONE COLUMNS; MODEL TESTS; GRANULAR COLUMNS; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; DEFORMATION; GEC;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103458
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Stone columns have been used to minimize the settlement of embankments on soft soils but their use in very soft soils can become challenging, partly because of the low confinement provided by the surrounding soil. Geosynthetic encased columns (GECs) have been successfully used to enhance to reduce settlements of embankments on soft soils. This paper describes an investigation on the performance of encased columns constructed on a very soft soil using different types of encasement (three woven geotextiles with different values of tensile stiffness) and different column fill materials (sand, gravel and recycled construction and demolition waste, RCDW). The results of load capacity tests conducted on large-scale models constructed to simulate the different types of GECs indicate that the displacement method adopted during column installation can lead to an enhanced shear strength in the smear zone that develops within the very soft soil. In addition, breakage of the column fill material was found to affect the load-settlement response of gravel and RCDW columns. Furthermore, the excess pore water pressure generated in the surrounding soil during installation, was found to remain limited to radial distances smaller than three times the GEC diameter.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 641
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Alexiew D., 2003, FDN INNOVATIONS OBSE, DOI [10.1061/40777(156)12, DOI 10.1061/40777(156)12]
[2]  
Alexiew D., 2015, Ground improvement case histories: Embankments with special reference to consolidation and other physical methods, P451
[3]   Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangement [J].
Ali, K. ;
Shahu, J. T. ;
Sharma, K. G. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 21 (02) :103-118
[4]   Model tests on geosynthetic-reinforced stone columns: a comparative study [J].
Ali, K. ;
Shahu, J. T. ;
Sharma, K. G. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 19 (04) :292-305
[5]   Behavior of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Soft Clay: Numerical and Analytical Evaluations [J].
Alkhorshid, N. R. ;
Araujo, G. L. S. ;
Palmeira, E. M. .
SOILS AND ROCKS, 2018, 41 (03) :333-343
[6]  
Alkhorshid N. R, 2017, THESIS
[7]  
Alkhorshid N.R., 2012, NUMERICAL ANAL SOFT
[8]  
Alkhorshid N.R., 2014, 17 C BRAS MEC COBR G
[9]   Performance of a geosynthetic-encased column (GEC) in soft ground: numerical and analytical studies [J].
Almeida, M. S. S. ;
Hosseinpour, I. ;
Riccio, M. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 20 (04) :252-262
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ASTMD5084 ASTM INT, DOI [10.1520/05084-16A, DOI 10.1520/05084-16A]