Flutter-boundary identification for time-domain computational aeroelasticity

被引:52
|
作者
McNamara, Jack J. [1 ]
Friedmann, Peretz P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.2514/1.26706
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Three time-domain damping/frequency/flutter identification techniques are discussed; namely, the moving-block approach, the least-squares curve-fitting method, and a system-identification technique using an autoregressive moving-average model of the aeroelastic system. These methods are evaluated for use with time-intensive computational aeroelastic simulations, represented by the aeroelastic transient responses of a double-wedge airfoil and three-dimensional wing in hypersonic flow. The responses are generated using the NASA Langley CFL3D computational aeroelastic code, in which the aerodynamic loads are computed from the unsteady Navier-Stokes equations. In general, the methods agree well. The system-identification technique, however, provided quick damping and frequency estimates with minimal response-record length. In the present case, the computational cost required to generate each aeroelastic transient was reduced by 75%. Finally, a flutter margin for discrete-time systems, constructed using the autoregressive moving-average approach, is evaluated for use in the hypersonic flow regime for the first time. For the binary-mode case, the flutter margin exhibited a linear correlation with dynamic pressure, minimizing the number of responses required to locate flutter. However, the flutter margin was not linear for the multimode system, indicating that it does not perform as expected in all cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1546 / 1555
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flutter boundary identification from time-domain simulations using the matrix pencil method
    Kiviaho, Jan F.
    Jacobson, Kevin E.
    Kennedy, Graeme J.
    AIAA Journal, 2019, 57 (08): : 3639 - 3640
  • [2] Flutter Boundary Identification from Time-Domain Simulations Using the Matrix Pencil Method
    Kiviaho, Jan F.
    Jacobson, Kevin E.
    Kennedy, Graeme J.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (08) : 3639 - 3645
  • [3] Time-domain impedance boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics
    Tam, CKW
    Auriault, L
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1996, 34 (05) : 917 - 923
  • [4] Time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to identification of bridge flutter derivatives
    Chen Z.
    Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2009, 3 (2): : 173 - 179
  • [5] Time-domain harmonic balance method for turbomachinery aeroelasticity
    20140417219061
    1600, AIAA International (52):
  • [6] Experimental identification of rational function coefficients for time-domain flutter analysis
    Chowdhury, AG
    Sarkar, PP
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2005, 27 (09) : 1349 - 1364
  • [7] Time-Domain Harmonic Balance Method for Turbomachinery Aeroelasticity
    Sicot, Frederic
    Gomar, Adrien
    Dufour, Guillaume
    Dugeai, Alain
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2014, 52 (01) : 62 - 71
  • [8] Time-domain impedance boundary conditions for computational acoustics and aeroacoustics
    Fung, KY
    Ju, HB
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2004, 18 (06) : 503 - 511
  • [9] Flutter-Boundary Prediction of a Morphing Wing in the Process of Adaptation
    Matsuzaki, Yuji
    Torii, Hiroshi
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2012, 50 (06) : 1257 - 1264
  • [10] Evaluation of time-domain damping identification methods for flutter-constrained optimization
    Jacobson, Kevin E.
    Kiviaho, Jan F.
    Kennedy, Graeme J.
    Smith, Marilyn J.
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2019, 87 : 174 - 188