Context checklist for industrial software engineering research and practice

被引:5
作者
Petersen, Kai [1 ,4 ]
Carlson, Jan [3 ]
Papatheocharous, Efi [2 ]
Wnuk, Krzysztof [1 ]
机构
[1] Blekinge Inst Technol, Karlskrona, Sweden
[2] RISE Res Inst Sweden AB, Kista, Sweden
[3] Malardalen Univ, Vasteras, Sweden
[4] Univ Appl Sci Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany
关键词
Context; Software engineering; Evidence-based software engineering; Empirical; Checklist; DRIVEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.csi.2021.103541
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The relevance of context is particularly stressed in case studies, where it is said that "case study is an empirical method aimed at investigating contemporary phenomena in their context". In this research, we classify context information and provide a context checklist for industrial software engineering. The checklist serves the purpose of (a) supporting researchers and practitioners in characterizing the context in which they are working; (b) supporting researchers with a checklist to identify relevant contextual information to elicit and report during primary and secondary studies. We utilized a systematic approach for constructing the classification of context information and provided a detailed definition for each item. We collected feedback from researchers as well as practitioners. The usefulness of the checklist was perceived more positively by researchers than practitioners, though they highlighted benefits (raising awareness of the importance of context and usefulness for management). The understandability was perceived positively by both practitioners and researchers. The checklist may serve as a "meta-model", forming the basis for specific adaptations for different research areas, and as input for researchers deciding which context information to extract in systematic reviews. The checklist may also help researchers in reporting context in research papers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Ali N.B, 2014, 2014 ACM IEEE INT S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SOFTWARE QUAL J
[3]  
Basili V.R., 1994, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, P528532
[4]   Critical success factors taxonomy for software process deployment [J].
Bayona-Ore, Sussy ;
Calvo-Manzano, Jose A. ;
Cuevas, Gonzalo ;
San-Feliu, Tomas .
SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2014, 22 (01) :21-48
[5]   On the search for industry-relevant regression testing research [J].
bin Ali, Nauman ;
Engstrom, Emelie ;
Taromirad, Masoumeh ;
Mousavi, Mohammad Reza ;
Minhas, Nasir Mehmood ;
Helgesson, Daniel ;
Kunze, Sebastian ;
Varshosaz, Mahsa .
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2019, 24 (04) :2020-2055
[6]   The Case for Context-Driven Software Engineering Research Generalizability Is Overrated [J].
Briand, Lionel ;
Bianculli, Domenico ;
Nejati, Shiva ;
Pastore, Fabrizio ;
Sabetzadeh, Mehrdad .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2017, 34 (05) :72-75
[7]   A Context Model for Architectural Decision Support [J].
Carlson, Jan ;
Papatheocharous, Efi ;
Petersen, Kai .
PROCEEDINGS 2016 1ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DECISION MAKING IN SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE, 2016, :9-15
[8]  
Cartaxo B., 2015, EXP SOFTW ENG LAT AM, P1
[9]   The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework [J].
Clarke, Paul ;
O'Connor, Rory V. .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 54 (05) :433-447
[10]   Recommended Steps for Thematic Synthesis in Software Engineering [J].
Cruzes, Daniela S. ;
Dyba, Tore .
2011 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MEASUREMENT (ESEM 2011), 2011, :275-284