Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs

被引：37

作者：

Erkan, Mustafa ^{[1
]}

Gurel, Hakan Gurcan ^{[1
]}

Nur, Metin ^{[1
]}

Demirel, Baris ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Haydarpasa Res & Training Hosp, Dent Clin, Sect Orthodont, Istanbul, Turkey

来源：

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS | 2012年 / 34卷 / 03期

关键词：

LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION; RADIOGRAPHS; ACCURACY; ERRORS; ANALOG;

D O I：

10.1093/ejo/cjr008

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

The aim of this investigation was to compare the traditional method of manual cephalometric tracing with four different computerized tracing programs, where the lateral cephalograms were scanned at 300 dpi and digitized onscreen. Thirty randomly selected cephalometric radiographs were used in this study. Four programs Dolphin Imaging, Vistadent, Nemoceph, and Quick Ceph were evaluated. Three dental, 11 skeletal, and 1 soft tissue parameters were measured that consisted of 5 linear and 10 angular measurements. Statistical analysis was carried out using multivariate analysis of variance and Box's and Levene's tests. No statistically significant difference was found between manual tracing and the computerized tracing programs. The measurements obtained with the cephalometric analysis programs used in the study were reliable.

引用

页码：318 / 321

页数：4

共 19 条

[1] RELIABILITY OF HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS .1. LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION [J].

BAUMRIND, S ;

FRANTZ, RC .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1971, 60 (02) :111-&

[2] MEASUREMENT ON RADIOGRAPHS [J].

BJORK, A ;

SOLOW, B .

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1962, 41 (03) :672-&

[3]

Broadbent BH, 1931, ANGLE ORTHOD, V1, P93

[4]

Chen SK, 2004, ANGLE ORTHOD, V74, P501

[5]

Chen YJ, 2000, ANGLE ORTHOD, V70, P387

[6]

Chen YJ, 2004, ANGLE ORTHOD, V74, P155

[7]

Cohen A M, 1986, Br J Orthod, V13, P105

[8]

Enlow D.H., 1996, Essentials of facial growth, P259

[9]

Forsyth DB, 1996, ANGLE ORTHOD, V66, P37

[10]

Forsyth DB, 1996, ANGLE ORTHOD, V66, P43

← 1 2 →