Proactivity, stress appraisals, and problem-solving: A cross-level moderated mediation model

被引:19
作者
Espedido, Andrea [1 ]
Searle, Ben J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Fac Human Sci, Dept Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Stress appraisal; proactivity; problem-solving; Multilevel; challenge-hindrance; psychological safety climate; PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; WORK; JOB; BEHAVIOR; DEMANDS; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGE; CREATIVITY; EMPLOYEE; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/02678373.2020.1767723
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Problem-solving demands have been shown to exert both positive and negative effects on employees. We examined whether these inconsistencies could be explained by the way people appraise (interpret) their problem-solving demands, either as a challenge or a threat. We proposed a cross-level moderated mediation model whereby the effects of problem-solving demands on a range of proactive behaviours (i.e. proactive innovation, problem prevention, voice, and proactive undermining) would be mediated by stress appraisals and moderated by psychological safety climate. Surveys were administered twice daily for 5 consecutive workdays to 248 employees from a variety of industries. Multilevel analyses showed that appraisals of challenge mediated the relationship between problem-solving demands and favourable forms of proactivity, whereas appraisals of threat mediated the relationship with unfavourable forms of proactivity. Depending on the type of proactive behaviour, these effects manifested at either the within- or between-person level. Finally, we observed a cross-level moderated mediation effect in which psychological safety climate strengthened the positive effects of within-person problem-solving demands on challenge appraisal, which in turn promoted proactive innovation. These results emphasise the explanatory power of stress appraisals and climate in shaping a range of proactive behaviours.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 152
页数:21
相关论文
共 60 条
[41]   The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work [J].
Morgeson, Frederick P. ;
Humphrey, Stephen E. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1321-1339
[42]  
O*NET, 2017, IND
[43]   Diary Studies in Organizational Research An Introduction and Some Practical Recommendations [J].
Ohly, Sandra ;
Sonnentag, Sabine ;
Niessen, Cornelia ;
Zapf, Dieter .
JOURNAL OF PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 9 (02) :79-93
[44]   Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study [J].
Ohly, Sandra ;
Fritz, Charlotte .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 31 (04) :543-565
[45]   Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors [J].
Parker, Sharon K. ;
Collins, Catherine G. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 36 (03) :633-662
[46]   Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J].
Podsakoff, PM ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Lee, JY ;
Podsakoff, NP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :879-903
[47]   SOCIAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING APPROACH TO JOB ATTITUDES AND TASK DESIGN [J].
SALANCIK, GR ;
PFEFFER, J .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1978, 23 (02) :224-253
[48]  
Satorra A, 2000, ADV ST THEO, V36, P233
[49]   The Buffering Effect of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Strategy Use On The Relationship Between Problem Solving Demands and Occupational Well-Being: A Daily Diary Study [J].
Schmitt, Antje ;
Zacher, Hannes ;
Frese, Michael .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 17 (02) :139-149
[50]  
Searle B. J., 2009, BAM 2009 C P BRIGHT