Dose Equivalents for Antipsychotic Drugs: The DDD Method

被引:555
作者
Leucht, Stefan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Samara, Myrto [1 ]
Heres, Stephan [1 ]
Davis, John M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Psychiat, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Dept Psychosis Studies, London, England
[4] Univ Illinois, Inst Psychiat, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Maryland Psychiat Res Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
dosage; equivalency; schizophrenia; antipsychotic drugs; olanzapine; risperidone; quetiapine; CHLORPROMAZINE EQUIVALENTS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1093/schbul/sbv167
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Dose equivalents of antipsychotics are an important but difficult to define concept, because all methods have weaknesses and strongholds. Methods: We calculated dose equivalents based on defined daily doses (DDDs) presented by the World Health Organisation's Collaborative Center for Drug Statistics Methodology. Doses equivalent to 1 mg olanzapine, 1 mg risperidone, 1 mg haloperidol, and 100 mg chlorpromazine were presented and compared with the results of 3 other methods to define dose equivalence (the "minimum effective dose method," the "classical mean dose method," and an international consensus statement). Results: We presented dose equivalents for 57 first-generation and second-generation antipsychotic drugs, available as oral, parenteral, or depot formulations. Overall, the identified equivalent doses were comparable with those of the other methods, but there were also outliers. Conclusions: The major strength of this method to define dose response is that DDDs are available for most drugs, including old antipsychotics, that they are based on a variety of sources, and that DDDs are an internationally accepted measure. The major limitations are that the information used to estimate DDDS is likely to differ between the drugs. Moreover, this information is not publicly available, so that it cannot be reviewed. The WHO stresses that DDDs are mainly a standardized measure of drug consumption, and their use as a measure of dose equivalence can therefore be misleading. We, therefore, recommend that if alternative, more " scientific" dose equivalence methods are available for a drug they should be preferred to DDDs. Moreover, our summary can be a useful resource for pharmacovigilance studies.
引用
收藏
页码:S90 / S94
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1969, DIAGNOSIS DRUG TREAT
[2]  
BALDESSARINI RJ, 1988, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V45, P79
[3]   A NOTE ON THE USE OF THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT IN THE EVALUATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN 2 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1990, 20 (05) :337-340
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]  
CASEY JF, 1960, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V2, P210
[6]  
Committee JF, 2012, BRIT NATL FORMULARY
[7]  
Davis J.M., 1989, Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, V5th, P1591
[8]  
DAVIS JM, 1976, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V33, P858
[9]   DOSE EQUIVALENCE OF ANTI-PSYCHOTIC DRUGS [J].
DAVIS, JM .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1974, 11 :65-69
[10]   THE CLINICAL IMPACT OF REPORTED VARIANCE IN POTENCY OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC AGENTS [J].
DEWAN, MJ ;
KOSS, M .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 91 (04) :229-232