A unified mathematical framework for the measurement of richness and evenness within and among multiple communities

被引:208
作者
Olszewski, TD [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geol & Geophys, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12519.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Biodiversity can be divided into two aspects: richness (the number of species or other taxa in a community or sample) and evenness (a measure of the distribution of relative abundances of different taxa in a community or sample). Sample richness is typically evaluated using rarefaction, which normalizes for sample size. Evenness is typically summarized in a single value. It is shown here that Hurlbert's probability of interspecific encounter (A,), a commonly used sample-size independent measure of evenness, equals the slope of the steepest part of the rising limb of a rarefaction curve. This means that rarefaction curves provide information on both aspects of diversity In addition, regional diversity (gamma) can be broken down into the diversity within local communities (alpha) and differences in taxonomic composition among local communities (beta). Beta richness is expressed by the difference between the composite rarefaction curve of all samples in a region with the collector's curve for the same samples. The differences of the initial slopes of these two curves reflect the beta evenness thanks to the relationship between rarefaction and A,, This relationship can be further extended to help interpret species-area curves (SAC's). As previous authors have described, rarefaction provides the null hypothesis of passive sampling for SAC's, which can be interpreted as regional collector's curves. This allows evaluation of richness and evenness at local and regional scales using a single family of well-established, mathematically related techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 387
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   The distribution of abundance in neutral communities [J].
Bell, G .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2000, 155 (05) :606-617
[2]   Species-area curves, diversity indices, and species abundance distributions: A multifractal analysis [J].
Borda-de-Agua, L ;
Hubbell, SP ;
McAllister, M .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2002, 159 (02) :138-155
[3]   A NEW RELATIONSHIP FOR RAREFACTION [J].
BREWER, A ;
WILLIAMSON, M .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1994, 3 (04) :373-379
[4]  
Brown J. H., 1995, Macroecology
[5]  
Caswell Hal, 1993, P99
[6]   Comparing classical community models: Theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity [J].
Chave, J ;
Muller-Landau, HC ;
Levin, SA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2002, 159 (01) :1-23
[7]   RANDOMNESS, AREA, AND SPECIES RICHNESS [J].
COLEMAN, BD ;
MARES, MA ;
WILLIG, MR ;
HSIEH, YH .
ECOLOGY, 1982, 63 (04) :1121-1133
[8]   ON RANDOM PLACEMENT AND SPECIES-AREA RELATIONS [J].
COLEMAN, BD .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 1981, 54 (3-4) :191-215
[9]   STATISTICS AND BIOLOGY OF THE SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP [J].
CONNOR, EF ;
MCCOY, ED .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1979, 113 (06) :791-833
[10]  
Gaston K. J., 2000, PATTERN PROCESS MACR