Fulvestrant in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: Is it still effective as a very advanced line of treatment?

被引:0
作者
Safra, Tamar
Greenberg, Julia
Ron, Ilan G.
Ben-Yosef, Rami
Inbar, Moshe
Sarid, David
Yaal-Hahoshen, Neora
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Oncol, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Ramat Aviv, Israel
来源
ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2008年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
fulvestrant; pretreated metastatic breast cancer; hormone receptor-positive tumors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Over 75% of postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer have hormone receptor-positive tumors. Endocrine therapy, with its more favorable toxicity profile than chemotherapy, is the preferred treatment modality for these patients. Objectives: To assess our experience with fulvestrant, an antiestrogen, in an advanced phase of treatment, after progression on the classical anti-estrogen (tamoxifen) and aromatase inhibitors Methods: The study group comprised 46 patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with fulvestrant during the years 2002-2006. Fulvestrant was given monthly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: The median number of fulvestrant cycles was 4.14 (range 1-32). Four patients are still on the treatment. The reasons for treatment discontinuation include disease progression (n=40), refusal (n=1), and allergic reaction (n=1). Ten patients (22%) achieved partial response and 22 (47%) had stable disease. Fourteen (30%) had disease progression with a response rate of 22% and a clinical benefit of 67%, and 14 (30%) had stable disease for > 6 months. Twenty-five patients (54%) are still alive, 4 (9%) without and 21 (45%) with disease progression. With a median follow-up of 15 months (range 1-30.1), the median time to progression was estimated to be 4 months (95% confidence interval 3.1-4.9), and the estimated overall survival 20.1 (95% CI 13.6 to upper limit; not reached yet). The 1 year estimated survival is 67%. Conclusions: In terms of late-phase administration, fulvestrant still appears to have a good clinical effect, with a time to progression of 4 months and a clinical benefit > 60%, notably accompanied by only very mild toxicity. Irrespective of the line of treatment the patients received, the 4 month time to progression was constant and the medication was still working effectively in a very late line of treatment in metastatic breast cancer. Fulvestrant offers clinical benefit with very mild toxicity in a very heavily pretreated population and the medication is recommended, even in patients who received many lines of chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 343
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine treatment [J].
Howell, A ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Albano, JQ ;
Aschermannova, A ;
Mauriac, L ;
Kleeberg, UR ;
Vergote, I ;
Erikstein, B ;
Webster, A ;
Morris, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (16) :3396-3403
[2]   Aromatase inhibitors for therapy of advanced breast cancer [J].
Ingle, JN ;
Suman, VJ .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (1-5) :113-119
[3]  
Ingle JN, 2004, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V88, pS38
[4]   Sequencing of endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer [J].
Ingle, JN .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (01) :362S-367S
[5]   Activity of exemestane in metastatic breast cancer after failure of nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors: A phase II trial [J].
Lonning, PE ;
Bajetta, E ;
Murray, R ;
Tubiana-Hulin, M ;
Eisenberg, PD ;
Mickiewicz, E ;
Celio, L ;
Pitt, P ;
Mita, M ;
Aaronson, NK ;
Fowst, C ;
Arkhipov, A ;
di Salle, E ;
Polli, A ;
Massimini, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (11) :2234-2244
[6]   Double-blind, Randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy: Results of a North American trial [J].
Osborne, CK ;
Pippen, J ;
Jones, SE ;
Parker, LM ;
Ellis, M ;
Come, S ;
Gertler, SZ ;
May, JT ;
Burton, G ;
Dimery, I ;
Webster, A ;
Morris, C ;
Elledge, R ;
Buzdar, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (16) :3386-3395
[7]  
Pritchard KI, 2003, CLIN CANCER RES, V9, p460S
[8]   Sensitivity to further endocrine therapy is retained following progression on first-line fulvestrant [J].
Robertson, JFR ;
Howell, A ;
Gorbunova, VA ;
Watanabe, T ;
Pienkowski, T ;
Lichinitser, MR .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 92 (02) :169-174
[9]   Fulvestrant versus anastrozole for the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women - A prospective combined analysis of two multicenter trials [J].
Robertson, JFR ;
Osborne, CK ;
Howell, A ;
Jones, SE ;
Mauriac, L ;
Ellis, M ;
Kleeberg, UR ;
Come, SE ;
Vergote, I ;
Gertler, S ;
Buzdar, A ;
Webster, A ;
Morris, C .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (02) :229-238
[10]  
WAKELING AE, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P3867