What do objects want?

被引:186
作者
Gosden, C
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Sch Archaeol, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Pitt Rivers Museum, Oxford, England
关键词
effects; form; Roman Britain;
D O I
10.1007/s10816-005-6928-x
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This paper develops an argument for the agency of objects, looking at the effects objects have on people. Groups of related objects, such as pots or metal ornaments, create stylistic universes which affect producers and users of new objects, bound by the canons of style. For an object to be socially powerful in a recognized manner, the form of the object lays down certain rules of use which influence the sensory and emotional impacts of the object. Formal properties of artifacts are influenced by the genealogy of the object class, including historical continuities and changes, and also its perceived source. The forms of objects, the historical trajectories of the class of objects and their perceived sources combine to have social effects on people, shaping people as socially effective entities. Britain's incorporation into the Roman Empire between 150 BC and AD 200 provides an excellent case study through which to look at the changing corpora of objects, which had continuities and changes in form, a set of subtle attributions of sources and a complex range of social effects.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 211
页数:19
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, SYMBOLS ACTION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MAT CULTURE READER
[3]  
Bayley J., 2004, ROMAN BROOCHES BRITA
[4]  
Clarke David L., 1978, ANAL ARCHAEOLOGY
[5]  
Creighton J. D., 2000, COINS POWER LATE IRO
[6]  
Fulford M., 2001, BRITANNIA, V32, P199, DOI DOI 10.2307/526956
[7]  
Gell A., 1998, Art and Agency : An Anthropological Theory
[8]  
Gosden C., 2003, BRITANNIA, V34, P65
[9]  
Gosden C., 2004, ARCHAEOLOGY COLONIAL
[10]  
HASELGROVE C, 1997, OXBOW MONOGRAPHS, V71, P51