Radiation damage to DNA in DNA-protein complexes

被引:43
|
作者
Spotheim-Maurizot, M. [2 ]
Davidkova, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nucl Phys Inst AS CR, Dept Radiat Dosimetry, Prague 18086 8, Czech Republic
[2] CNRS, Ctr Biophys Mol, F-45071 Orleans, France
关键词
DNA-protein complex; Ionizing radiation; Molecular structure; HYDROXYL RADICAL ATTACK; STOCHASTIC SIMULATION; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; FAST-NEUTRONS; RADIOPROTECTION; RADIOLYSIS; BINDING; REPRESSOR; RADIOSENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.003
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The most aggressive product of water radiolysis, the hydroxyl (OH center dot) radical, is responsible for the indirect effect of ionizing radiations on DNA in solution and aerobic conditions. According to radiolytic footprinting experiments, the resulting strand breaks and base modifications are inhomogeneously distributed along the DNA molecule irradiated free or bound to ligands (polyamines, thiols, proteins). A Monte-Carlo based model of simulation of the reaction of OH center dot radicals with the macromolecules, called RADACK, allows calculating the relative probability of damage of each nucleotide of DNA irradiated alone or in complexes with proteins. RADACK calculations require the knowledge of the three dimensional structure of DNA and its complexes (determined by X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy or molecular modeling). The confrontation of the calculated values with the results of the radiolytic footprinting experiments together with molecular modeling calculations show that: (1) the extent and location of the lesions are strongly dependent on the structure of DNA, which in turns is modulated by the base sequence and by the binding of proteins and (2) the regions in contact with the protein can be protected against the attack by the hydroxyl radicals via masking of the binding site and by scavenging of the radicals. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 48
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FURTHER CHARACTERIZATION OF IMMUNOSPECIFIC DNA-PROTEIN COMPLEXES
    CHIU, JF
    FUJITANI, H
    HNILICA, LS
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH, 1976, 17 (MAR): : 188 - 188
  • [22] DETERMINATION OF MELTING SEQUENCES IN DNA AND DNA-PROTEIN COMPLEXES BY DIFFERENCE SPECTRA
    RUSSELL, AP
    HERRMANN, RL
    DOWLING, LE
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1969, 9 (04) : 473 - &
  • [23] DNA-PROTEIN COMPLEXES NATURAL TARGETS FOR DNA-HYDROLYZING ANTIBODIES
    GOLOLOBOV, GV
    MIKHALAP, SV
    STAROV, AV
    KOLESNIKOV, AF
    GABIBOV, AG
    APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1994, 47 (2-3) : 305 - 315
  • [24] USING THE CHEMISTRY OF METAL-COMPLEXES TO STUDY THE STRUCTURE OF DNA AND DNA-PROTEIN COMPLEXES
    TULLIUS, TD
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 199 : 4 - INOR
  • [25] Classification of amino acids based on comparative analysis of contacts in DNA-protein complexes and specific DNA-protein interactions
    Anashkina A.A.
    Kuznetsov E.N.
    Batyanovskii A.V.
    Gnuchev N.V.
    Tumanyan V.G.
    Esipova N.G.
    Biophysics, 2013, 58 (6) : 766 - 770
  • [26] Influence of proteins in DNA damage: DNA-protein crosslink formation and lesion changes
    Merino, Edward J.
    Salam, Safnas Farwin Abdul
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [27] DNA-protein crosslinks: Damage and protection at the same time
    Dürauer S.
    Donsbach M.
    Stingele J.
    BIOspektrum, 2023, 29 (6) : 592 - 594
  • [28] Repair and damage tolerance mechanisms for DNA-protein crosslinks
    Ide, Hiroshi
    GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS, 2010, 85 (06) : 443 - 443
  • [29] DNA radiolysis in DNA-protein complexes: a stochastic simulation of attack by hydroxyl radicals
    Begusova, M
    Giliberto, S
    Gras, J
    Sy, D
    Charlier, M
    Spotheim-Maurizot, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2003, 79 (06) : 385 - 391
  • [30] Stabilizing labile DNA-protein complexes in polyacrylamide gels
    Sidorova, Nina Y.
    Hung, Stevephen
    Rau, Donald C.
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2010, 31 (04) : 648 - 653