Social preferences regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid Mediterranean region

被引:137
作者
Castro, A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Martin-Lopez, B. [3 ]
Garcia-LLorente, M. [3 ]
Aguilera, P. A. [2 ]
Lopez, E. [1 ,2 ]
Cabello, J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Almeria, Dept Plant Biol & Ecol, Andalusian Ctr Assessment & Monitoring Global Cha, La Canada De San Urbano 04120, Almeria, Spain
[2] Univ Almeria, Dept Biol Vegetal & Ecol, La Canada De San Urbano 04120, Almeria, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Beneficiaries; Conflicts; Contingent valuation; Perception; Social-ecological systems; CONTINGENT VALUATION; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; PERCEPTIONS; LANDSCAPE; MOTIVES; SPAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.05.013
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The valuation of ecosystem services has primarily been conducted within the context of the economic value of these services to society. Ecosystem services research has since advanced to identify conflicts of interest between different sectors of society while prioritizing conservation actions. This approach can be important in semiarid ecosystems, where biodiversity conservation can be hindered by a lack of community awareness. In the south-eastern Iberian Peninsula, conservation is perceived by society as a barrier to the economic development provided by agricultural or tourism activities. We use the contingent valuation method to identify community perception and economic values of different ecosystem services provided by semiarid ecosystems in the south-eastern Iberian Peninsula. This method identifies the perceptions of individuals benefiting from ecosystem services and examines their willingness to pay for the maintaining of these ecosystem services. Results showed that most respondents recognized the importance of services to human well-being and were willing to conserve these services. Preferences for maintaining water and air quality showed that respondents understood the relationship between the conservation of ecosystem services and local well-being. However, responses varied greatly across categories of beneficiaries: this finding highlights a potential conflict of interest that should be considered in any decision-making processes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1208
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands [J].
Agbenyega, Olivia ;
Burgess, Paul J. ;
Cook, Matthew ;
Morris, Joe .
LAND USE POLICY, 2009, 26 (03) :551-557
[2]  
[Anonymous], TRENDS CONDITIONS
[3]   Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy [J].
Anton, Christian ;
Young, Juliette ;
Harrison, Paula A. ;
Musche, Martin ;
Bela, Gyoergyi ;
Feld, Christian K. ;
Harrington, Richard ;
Haslett, John R. ;
Pataki, Gyoergy ;
Rounsevell, Mark D. A. ;
Skourtos, Michalis ;
Sousa, J. Paulo ;
Sykes, Martin T. ;
Tinch, Rob ;
Vandewalle, Marie ;
Watt, Allan ;
Settele, Josef .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (10) :2979-2994
[4]   Applying community structure analysis to ecosystem function:: Examples from pollination and carbon storage [J].
Balvanera, P ;
Kremen, C ;
Martínez-Ramos, M .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2005, 15 (01) :360-375
[5]  
Bateman I.J., 1993, Valuation of the Environment, Methods and Techniques: the Contingent Valuation Method
[6]  
Bernhardt E., 2006, Water Policy, V8, P475, DOI 10.2166/wp.2006.057
[7]  
Boyle K.J., 1999, Valuing Environmental Preferences. Theory and Practice of the CV Method in the US, EU, P183
[8]   Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence [J].
Carson, RT ;
Flores, NE ;
Meade, NF .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (02) :173-210
[9]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[10]   Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes [J].
de Groot, R .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 75 (3-4) :175-186