A New Method for Assessment of Retronasal Olfactory Function

被引:22
作者
Yoshino, Ayaho [1 ,2 ]
Goektas, Goekhan [1 ]
Mahmut, Mehmet K. [1 ,3 ]
Zhu, Yunmeng [1 ]
Goektas, Oender [4 ]
Komachi, Taro [2 ]
Okubo, Kimihiro [5 ]
Hummel, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Smell & Taste Clin, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] Chiba Hokusoh Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nippon Med Sch, Chiba, Japan
[3] Macquarie Univ, Dept Psychol, Food Flavour & Fragrance Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] ENT Ctr Kudamm, Berlin, Germany
[5] Nippon Med Sch, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Olfaction disorders; retronasal olfaction; retronasal identification test; smell; ODOR DISCRIMINATION; PENNSYLVANIA SMELL; NORMATIVE DATA; IDENTIFICATION; ORTHONASAL; UNIVERSITY; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/lary.28698
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis The aim of the study was to develop a test for the assessment of retronasal olfaction in healthy participants and patients with olfactory disorders using "tasteless" powders. Study Design: Prospective case-control series. Methods A total of 150 participants (110 women, 40 men, mean age = 40 +/- 16 years) were recruited for this study; 100 were healthy controls and 50 were patients with olfactory loss due to infections of the upper respiratory tract (n = 25), idiopathic causes (n = 12), sinonasal disease (n = 7), and head trauma (n = 6). Orthonasal olfactory function was evaluated using the Sniffin' Sticks test battery, and retronasal olfaction was evaluated using powders lacking distinctive tastes administered to the oral cavity. To establish test-retest reliability, healthy participants had their orthonasal and retronasal function tested twice. Results The validity analyses revealed that the selected 16 stimuli differentiated between normosmic participants and patients with olfactory loss, and that retronasal and orthonasal olfaction were highly correlated. Conclusions The results of the present study indicate that patients with olfactory loss and controls can be clearly separated using a reliable test of retronasal olfaction based on 16 retronasal stimuli. Level of Evidence 2b Laryngoscope, 2020
引用
收藏
页码:E324 / E330
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Berchtold A., 2016, Methodol. Innov, V9, P1, DOI DOI 10.1177/2059799116672875
  • [2] Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
  • [3] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [4] Retronasal testing of olfactory function: an investigation and comparison in seven countries
    Croy, Ilona
    Hoffmann, Heike
    Philpott, Carl
    Rombaux, Philippe
    Welge-Luessen, Antje
    Vodicka, Jan
    Konstantinidis, Iordanis
    Morera, Eduardo
    Hummel, Thomas
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 271 (05) : 1087 - 1095
  • [5] DEEMS DA, 1991, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V117, P519
  • [6] UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SMELL IDENTIFICATION TEST - A RAPID QUANTITATIVE OLFACTORY FUNCTION-TEST FOR THE CLINIC
    DOTY, RL
    SHAMAN, P
    KIMMELMAN, CP
    DANN, MS
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 1984, 94 (02) : 176 - 178
  • [7] Measurement of sensitivity to olfactory flavor: Application in a study of aging and dentures
    Duffy, VB
    Cain, WS
    Ferris, AM
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 1999, 24 (06) : 671 - 677
  • [8] The Candy Smell Test in clinical routine
    Haxel, Boris R.
    Bertz-Duffy, Shannon
    Faldum, Andreas
    Trellakis, Sokrates
    Stein, Bernhard
    Renner, Bertold
    Kobal, Gerd
    Letzel, Stephan
    Mann, Wolf J.
    Muttray, Axel
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2011, 25 (04) : E145 - E148
  • [9] A new method for comparing orthonasal and retronasal olfaction
    Heilmann, S
    Hummel, T
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 118 (02) : 412 - 419
  • [10] Clinical assessment of retronasal olfactory function
    Heilmann, S
    Strehle, G
    Rosenheim, K
    Damm, M
    Hummel, T
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2002, 128 (04) : 414 - 418