Contribution of proline and inorganic solutes to osmotic adjustment in cotton under salt stress

被引:156
作者
Meloni, DA
Oliva, MA [1 ]
Ruiz, HA
Martinez, CA
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Plant Biol, BR-36571000 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Natl Univ Santiago Del Estero, Fac Agron, RA-4200 Santiago Del Estero, Argentina
[3] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Soils, BR-36571000 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1081/PLN-100104983
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Physiological responses to salt stress were investigated in two cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars (Pora and Guazuncho) grown hydroponically under various concentrations of NaCl. Dry matter partitioning, plant water relations, mineral composition and proline content were studied. Proline and inorganic solutes were measured to determine their relative contribution to osmotic adjustment. Both leaf water potential (Psi (w)) and osmotic potential (Psi (s)) decreased in response to NaCl levels. Although Psi (w) and Psi (s), decreased during salt stress, pressure potential (Psi (p)) remained between 0.5 to 0.7 MPa in control and all NaCl treatments, even under 200 mol m(-3) NaCl. Increased NaCl levels resulted in a significant decrease in root, shoot and leaf growth biomass. Root/shoot ratio increased in response to salt stress. The responses of both cultivars to NaCl stress were similar. Increasing salinity levels increased plant Na+ and Cl-. Potassium level remained stable in the leaves and decreased in the roots with increasing salinity. Salinity decreased Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations in leaves but did not affect the root levels of these nutrients. The K/Na selectivity ratio was much greater in the saline treated plants than in the control plants. Osmotic adjustment of roots and leaves was predominantly due to Nat and Cl- accumulation; the contribution of proline to the osmotic adjustment seemed to be less important in these cotton cultivars.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 612
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   RESPONSES OF SOME GENETICALLY DIVERSE LINES OF CHICK PEA (CICER-ARIETINUM L) TO SALT [J].
ASHRAF, M ;
WAHEED, A .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1993, 154 (02) :257-266
[2]   BREEDING FOR SALINITY TOLERANCE IN PLANTS [J].
ASHRAF, M .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 1994, 13 (01) :17-42
[3]  
Aspinall D., 1981, The physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants., P205
[4]   RAPID DETERMINATION OF FREE PROLINE FOR WATER-STRESS STUDIES [J].
BATES, LS ;
WALDREN, RP ;
TEARE, ID .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1973, 39 (01) :205-207
[5]  
BERNSTEIN L, 1966, AGRON J, V58, P201
[6]  
BRUGNOLI E, 1992, PLANTA, V187, P335, DOI 10.1007/BF00195657
[7]   GROWTH AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSES OF SPINACH TO SALINITY - IMPLICATIONS OF K+ NUTRITION FOR SALT TOLERANCE [J].
CHOW, WS ;
BALL, MC ;
ANDERSON, JM .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 17 (05) :563-578
[8]   DISPLACEMENT OF CA-2+ BY NA-+ FROM THE PLASMALEMMA OF ROOT-CELLS - A PRIMARY RESPONSE TO SALT STRESS [J].
CRAMER, GR ;
LAUCHLI, A ;
POLITO, VS .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 79 (01) :207-211
[9]   BIOCHEMICAL-MECHANISM IN GLOSSY SORGHUM LINES FOR RESISTANCE TO SALINITY STRESS [J].
DELAROSAIBARRA, M ;
MAITI, RK .
JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 146 (04) :515-519
[10]   DUAL PATTERN OF ION ABSORPTION BY PLANT CELLS AND BY PLANTS [J].
EPSTEIN, E .
NATURE, 1966, 212 (5068) :1324-&