Proximal Fallopian Tubal Embolization by Interventional Radiology prior to Embryo Transfer in Infertile Patients with Hydrosalpinx: A Prospective Study of an Off-label Treatment

被引:5
|
作者
Yang, Xinyun [1 ]
Zhu, Linling [1 ,2 ]
Le, Fang [1 ]
Lou, Hangying [1 ]
Zhao, Wei [1 ]
Pan, Peipei [1 ]
Zou, Yu [3 ]
Jin, Fan [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Womens Hosp, Dept Reprod Endocrinol, 1 Xueshi Rd, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Hangzhou Womens Hosp, Dept Reprod Endocrinol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, 1 Xueshi Rd, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
In vitro fertilization; Proximal tubal occlusion; Tubal infertility; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; HYSTEROSCOPIC PLACEMENT; SALPINGECTOMY; PREGNANCY; OCCLUSION; ESSURE; IVF; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; ICSI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.026
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To evaluate in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes of proximal fallopian tube embolization by interventional radiology compared with laparoscopic salpingectomy before embryo transfer (ET) in patients with hydrosalpinx. Design: A single-center, off-label, nonrandomized prospective study. Setting: Academic university hospital. Patients: One hundred fifty-five patients with hydrosalpinx were identified on ultrasound or hysterosalpingography desiring IVF between April 2016 and December 2017. Interventions: Radiologically guided tubal occlusion with embolization microcoils (RTO-EM) and laparoscopic salpingectomy. Measurements and Main Results: Of the 155 analyzed patients, 42 were treated with RTO-EM and 113 with laparoscopic salpingectomy. The subsequent IVF outcomes, including implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy (i.e., a fetal heartbeat on ultrasound beyond 10 weeks) were compared between the 2 groups. Implantation and clinical pregnancy per ET cycle in the RTO-EM group were similar to that of the salpingectomy group (26.7% vs 30.2% [p=.51] and 39.0% vs 45.3% [p=.40], respectively), with a similar miscarriage rate. There was no statistically significant difference in ectopic pregnancies between the 2 groups. Moreover, no difference was detected in ongoing pregnancy per cycle between the 2 groups (33.9% vs 41.2%; p=.32). The ongoing-pregnancy rate per patient following RTO-EM was 47.6% (20 of 42) compared with 61.9% (70 of 113) following salpingectomy (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.14; p=.11). Conclusion: Pregnancy in the RTO-EM group was comparable to the salpingectomy group in patients with hydrosalpinx before ET treatment. RTO-EMs may be an alternative to salpingectomy for patients with hydrosalpinx planning for IVF-ET. (C) 2019 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 115
页数:9
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device for the treatment of hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patients with a contraindication for laparoscopy
    Mijatovic, Velja
    Veersema, Sebastiaan
    Emanuel, Mark Hans
    Schats, Roel
    Hompes, Peter G. A.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (04) : 1338 - 1342