Commissioning for quality: Ten years of social care markets in England

被引:80
作者
Knapp, M [1 ]
Hardy, B
Forder, J
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Personal Social Serv, Res Unit, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0047279401006225
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The introduction of social care markets was one of the main planks of the Conservative government's community care reforms of 1990, The Labour government, whilst emphasising collaboration rather than competition, has not sought to reverse this policy. What have been the consequences? We discuss a decade of market-related change under five heads: purchasers, providers, commissioning, care planning and delivery, and users and carers. There have been quite substantial changes effected by social care markets in each domain, in turn generating a number of pertinent questions for the future success of social care policy in England. One is the very suitability of market-like arrangements in social care. Another is whether transaction costs are too high. More generally, are social care markets structured in a way that will generate the efficiency improvements that successive governments expect of them! Fourth, to what extent will price competition damage quality of care! Finally, will commissioning arrangements mature so as to achieve a better balance between competitive and collaborative modes of working?
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 306
页数:24
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, OFT995
[2]  
[Anonymous], CAR MAN ASS MAN GUID
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, COM AG IMPR CAR SERV
[4]  
*DEP HLTH, 2000, CM4818II
[5]  
Department of Health, 1999, NEW APPR SOC SERV PE
[6]  
Department of Health, 1997, NEW NHS MOD DEP
[7]   Mental health: market power and governance [J].
Forder, J .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2000, 19 (06) :877-905
[8]   Competition in the mixed economy of care [J].
Forder, J ;
Knapp, M ;
Wistow, G .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 1996, 25 :201-221
[9]  
FORDER JE, 2000, 1580 LOND SCH EC POL
[10]  
FORDER JE, 2000, 1599 PSSRU LOND SCH