Enhancing Long-Term Streamflow Forecasting and Predicting using Periodicity Data Component: Application of Artificial Intelligence

被引:82
作者
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher [1 ]
Kisi, Ozgur [2 ]
Demir, Vahdettin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Dept Civil & Struct Engn, Ukm Bangi 43600, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
[2] Canik Basari Univ, Fac Engn & Architecture, Dept Civil Engn, TR-55080 Samsun, Turkey
关键词
Streamflow forecasting and prediction; Periodicity component; LSSVR; MARS; M5-Tree; MLR; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ADAPTIVE REGRESSION SPLINES; HIMALAYAN MICRO-WATERSHEDS; M5 MODEL TREES; NEURAL-NETWORKS; RIVER; PERFORMANCE; RUNOFF; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-016-1408-5
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Streamflow forecasting and predicting are significant concern for several applications of water resources and management including flood management, determination of river water potentials, environmental flow analysis, and agriculture and hydro-power generation. Forecasting and predicting of monthly streamflows are investigated by using three heuristic regression techniques, least square support vector regression (LSSVR), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and M5 Model Tree (M5-Tree). Data from four different stations, Besiri and Malabadi located in Turkey, Hit and Baghdad located in Iraq, are used in the analysis. Cross validation method is employed in the applications. In the first stage of the study, the heuristic regression models are compared with each other and multiple linear regression (MLR) in forecasting one month ahead streamflow of each station, individually. In the second stage, the models are evaluated and compared in predicting streamflow of one station using data of nearby station. The research investigated also the influence of the periodicity component (month number of the year) as an external sub-set in modeling long-term streamflow. In both stages, the comparison results indicate that the LSSVR model generally performs superior to the MARS, M5-Tree and MLR models. In addition, it is seen that adding periodicity as input to the models significantly increase their accuracy in forecasting and predicting monthly streamflows in both stages of the study.
引用
收藏
页码:4125 / 4151
页数:27
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Abrahart RJ, 2000, HYDROL PROCESS, V14, P2157, DOI 10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12<2157::AID-HYP57>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]   Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting [J].
Abrahart, Robert J. ;
Anctil, Francois ;
Coulibaly, Paulin ;
Dawson, Christian W. ;
Mount, Nick J. ;
See, Linda M. ;
Shamseldin, Asaad Y. ;
Solomatine, Dimitri P. ;
Toth, Elena ;
Wilby, Robert L. .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 36 (04) :480-513
[4]   Comparison of multivariate adaptive regression splines with coupled wavelet transform artificial neural networks for runoff forecasting in Himalayan micro-watersheds with limited data [J].
Adamowski, Jan ;
Chan, Hiu Fung ;
Prasher, Shiv O. ;
Sharda, Vishwa Nath .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2012, 14 (03) :731-744
[5]   ANN Based Sediment Prediction Model Utilizing Different Input Scenarios [J].
Afan, Haitham Abdulmohsin ;
El-Shafie, Ahmed ;
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher ;
Hameed, Mohammed Majeed ;
Mohtar, Wan Hanna Melini Wan ;
Hussain, Aini .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (04) :1231-1245
[6]   Artificial neural network model for synthetic streamflow generation [J].
Ahmed, Juran Ali ;
Sarma, Arup Kumar .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (06) :1015-1029
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ADV DATA BASED APPRO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Unconstrained Optimization: Practical Methods of Optimization
[9]   Neural networks and M5 model trees in modelling water level-discharge relationship [J].
Bhattacharya, B ;
Solomatine, DP .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2005, 63 :381-396
[10]  
Box G., 1970, Control