A head mounted augmented reality design practice for maintenance assembly: Toward meeting perceptual and cognitive needs of AR users

被引:60
作者
Ariansyah, Dedy [1 ]
Erkoyuncu, John Ahmet [1 ]
Eimontaite, Iveta [2 ]
Johnson, Teegan [2 ]
Oostveen, Anne-Marie [2 ]
Fletcher, Sarah [2 ]
Sharples, Sarah [3 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Aerosp Transport & Mfg, Ctr Digital Engn & Mfg, Bedford MK43 0AL, England
[2] Cranfield Univ, Sch Aerosp Transport & Mfg, Ind Psychol & Human Factors Grp, Bedford MK43 0AL, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Human Factors Res Grp, Fac Engn, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Augmented reality; Head-mounted display; Eye gaze behaviours; Joint cognitive system; Usability; Multiple resource model; USABILITY; REPRESENTATION; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; ANIMATION; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103597
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Head Mounted Display (HMD) based Augmented Reality (AR) is being increasingly used in manufacturing and maintenance. However, limited research has been done to understand user interaction with AR interfaces, which may lead to poor usability, risk of occupational hazards, and low acceptance of AR systems. This paper uses a theoretically-driven approach to interaction design to investigate the impact of different AR modalities in terms of information mode (i.e. video vs. 3D animation) and interaction modality (i.e. hand-gesture vs. voice command) on user performance, workload, eye gaze behaviours, and usability during a maintenance assembly task. The results show that different information modes have distinct impacts compared to paper-based maintenance, in particular, 3D animation led to a 14% improvement over the video instructions in task completion time. Moreover, insights from eye gaze behaviours such as number of fixations and transition between Areas of Interest (AOIs) revealed the differences in attention switching and task comprehension difficulty with the choice of AR modalities. While, subjective user perceptions highlight some ergonomic issues such as misguidance and overreliance, which must be considered and addressed from the joint cognitive systems' (JCSs) perspective and in line with the predictions derived from the Multiple Resources Model.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 70 条
[31]   Influences of augmented reality head-worn display type and user interface design on performance and usability in simulated warehouse order picking [J].
Kim, Sunwook ;
Nussbaum, Maury A. ;
Gabbard, Joseph L. .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2019, 74 :186-193
[32]  
LEWIS JR, 1992, PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS SOCIETY, 36TH ANNUAL MEETING, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1259, DOI 10.1177/154193129203601617
[33]   Projects in VR [J].
Livingston, MA .
IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 25 (06) :6-9
[34]   Comparing Video and Augmented Reality Assistance in Manual Assembly [J].
Loch, Frieder ;
Quint, Fabian ;
Brishtel, Iuliia .
12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENTS - IE 2016, 2016, :147-150
[35]   Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning [J].
Lowe, R .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2004, 14 (03) :257-274
[36]   Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning [J].
Lowe, RK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 1999, 14 (02) :225-244
[37]   The Effect of Spatial Reference on Visual Attention and Workload during Viewpoint Guidance in Augmented Reality [J].
Markov-Vetter, Daniela ;
Luboschik, Martin ;
Islam, Abm Tariqul ;
Gauger, Peter ;
Staadt, Oliver .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON SPATIAL USER INTERACTION, SUI 2020, 2020,
[38]   Interaction with Virtual Content using Augmented Reality: A User Study in Assembly Procedures [J].
Marques B. ;
Alves J. ;
Neves M. ;
Justo I. ;
Santos A. ;
Rainho R. ;
Maio R. ;
Costa D. ;
Ferreira C. ;
DIas P. ;
Santos B.S. .
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 4 (ISS)
[39]  
Microsoft, 2019, MICR HOL 2
[40]  
Microsoft, 2019, EYE TRACK HOL 2