Causes and consequences of underutilised capacity in a tourist resort development

被引:11
作者
Palmer, Adrian [1 ,2 ]
Mathel, Virginie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Swansea, Sch Business & Econ, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
[2] ESC Rennes Sch Business, F-35065 Rennes, France
关键词
Resort development; Ski resorts; Holiday homes; Economic development; multiplier effects; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; RESPONSE RATES; IMPACTS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.tourman.2009.12.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is a widespread presumption that the development of tourism resorts brings direct and indirect benefits to the area where they are located. There has been extensive critical discussion about the magnitude and distribution of these benefits. This paper adds to knowledge of these benefits by investigating the causes of under-utilisation of tourist resort capacity, typified by the problem of "empty beds". Many owners of holiday homes in tourist resorts choose not to rent out their property when they are not making personal use of it, thereby reducing income earning potential of businesses in the area. This paper reports on a qualitative and quantitative study of holiday home owners at a ski resort in France. While personal use of properties was low, 40% of owners had never rented out their property. Analysis of the data converged on four emergent themes to explain this apparent reluctance to rent out: fears about the social habits of renters: issues of freedom and flexibility in use of their property; life course changes which forced renting/non-renting decisions; and financial issues. Financial issues were not a driver of investment/rental decisions, but derived from other social and lifestyle factors. The paper makes suggestions about how resort management can help to reduce owners' reluctance to rent, and thereby alleviate problems associated with empty beds. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 935
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] ANRIG P, 1985, ZWEITWOHNUNGEN TOURI
  • [2] Bieger T., 2007, International Journal of Hospitality Management, V26, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.10.011
  • [3] BRILLARD D, 1999, APPROCHE TERME PRIX
  • [4] Buller H., 1994, INT COUNTERURBANIZAT
  • [5] ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES - A METAANALYSIS
    CHURCH, AH
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1993, 57 (01) : 62 - 79
  • [6] Clark T.A., 2006, MOUNTAIN RESORT PLAN
  • [7] Effects of incentive size and timing on response rates to a follow-up wave of a longitudinal mailed survey
    Collins, RL
    Ellickson, PL
    Hays, RD
    McCaffrey, DF
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 2000, 24 (04) : 347 - 363
  • [8] Recreational housing and local government finance
    Deller, SC
    Marcouiller, DW
    Green, GP
    [J]. ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (03) : 687 - 705
  • [9] Dwyer L., 2000, Current Issues in Tourism, V3, P325, DOI 10.1080/13683500008667877
  • [10] Frederick Martha., 1993, Economic Development Quarterly, V7, P215, DOI DOI 10.1177/089124249300700207