Organic Oat Response to Variety, Seeding Rate, and Nutrient Source and Rate

被引:4
|
作者
Wilson, Melissa L. [1 ]
Evans, Emily E. [2 ]
Klossner, Lee [2 ]
Pagliari, Paulo H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Soil Water & Climate, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Soil Water & Climate, 23669 130th St, Lamberton, MN 56152 USA
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 07期
关键词
organic oat; manure application; compost application; oat production; NITROGEN-FERTILIZER; CROP YIELD; MANURE; SOIL; PHOSPHORUS; QUALITY; GRAIN; CULTIVARS; WHEAT; MINERALIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy11071418
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Oat (Avena sativa L.) is an important crop for organic production systems in the upper Midwest, but limited information on optimal nutrient management and seeding rates is available. Oat varieties representing three maturity groups were evaluated during 2015 and 2016 in Lamberton, Minnesota on organically certified ground previously planted to alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Two oat seeding rates (110 and 145 kg ha(-1)), two nutrient sources (raw and composted beef manure), and four N application rates (0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha(-1)) were studied. Plant population; number of tillers; grain yield; grain nutrient removal (primary and secondary macronutrients); and post-harvest soil nitrate, Bray P-1, and K in the top 0 to 15 cm layer were measured. Grain yield was 4.8, 4.0, and 3.8 kg ha(-1) for late maturing Deon, early maturing Tack/Saber, and medium maturing Shelby, respectively. Yield was optimized at a nutrient application rate of 82.3 kg N ha(-1) and decreased at higher rates. Grain N content was not related to yield, suggesting that the other nutrients in manure and compost may have been responsible for optimizing yield. High application rates resulted in increased residual soil test P and K levels, which could become problematic if not managed appropriately.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Protein and carbohydrate fractions of common vetch-oat mixtures depending on stage of growth and seeding rate in the mixtures
    Markovic, Jordan
    Vasic, Tanja
    Terzic, Dragan
    Strbanovic, Ratibor
    Knezevic, Jasmina
    Blagojevic, Milomir
    Lazarevic, Dorde
    EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2020, 32 (12): : 890 - 896
  • [22] Response of irrigated corn silage to seeding rate and row spacing in southern Alberta
    Beres, B. L.
    Bremer, E.
    Van Dasselaar, C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2008, 88 (04) : 713 - 716
  • [23] Performance of Dry Direct-Seeded Rice in Response to Genotype and Seeding Rate
    Mahajan, Gulshan
    Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2016, 108 (01) : 257 - 265
  • [24] Corn, cotton, and peanut response to row spacing, seeding rate, and irrigation system
    Sorensen, Ronald B.
    Lamb, Marshall C.
    Butts, Christopher L.
    JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2023, 37 (03) : 323 - 340
  • [25] The effects of sowing date and seeding rate on spelt and common wheat protein composition and characteristics
    Mikos-Szymanska, M.
    Podolska, G.
    QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SAFETY OF CROPS & FOODS, 2016, 8 (02) : 289 - 300
  • [26] Evaluation of Poultry Litter and Organic Fertilizer Rate and Source for Production of Organic Short-day Onions
    Boyhan, George E.
    Hicks, Ray J.
    Torrance, Reid L.
    Riner, Cliff M.
    Hill, C. Randell
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 304 - 307
  • [27] Municipal Compost as a Nutrient Source for Organic Crop Production in New Zealand
    Horrocks, Abie
    Curtin, Denis
    Tregurtha, Craig
    Meenken, Esther
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2016, 6 (02):
  • [28] Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Seeding Rate on Yield of Alfalfa and Weeds
    He, Feng
    Xie, Kaiyun
    Li, Xianglin
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2018, 27 (02): : 647 - 653
  • [29] Seeding rate effects on forge productivity and nutritive value of sorghum
    Mekasha, Aklilu
    Min, Doohong
    Bascom, Nathnael
    Vipham, Jessie
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2022, 114 (01) : 201 - 215
  • [30] RUNOFF NUTRIENT LOADS AS AFFECTED BY RESIDUE COVER, MANURE APPLICATION RATE, AND FLOW RATE
    Thayer, C. A.
    Gilley, J. E.
    Durso, L. M.
    Marx, D. B.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2012, 55 (01) : 249 - 258