A Comparison of Physical Therapy Protocols Between Open Latarjet Coracoid Transfer and Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

被引:9
作者
Beletsky, Alexander [1 ]
Cancienne, Jourdan M. [2 ]
Manderle, Brandon J. [1 ]
Mehta, Nabil [1 ]
Wilk, Kevin E. [3 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Div Sports Med, Midwest Orthopaed Rush, 1611 West Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Southern Orthopaed Specialists New Orleans, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Amer Sports Med Inst, Champ Sports Med, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH | 2020年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
Latarjet; Bankart; rehabilitation; return to sport; shoulder instability; REHABILITATION GUIDELINE; SHOULDER INSTABILITY; AMERICAN SOCIETY; BONE;
D O I
10.1177/1941738119887396
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: Recent studies examining return to sport after traumatic shoulder instability suggest faster return-to-sport time lines after bony stabilization when compared with soft tissue stabilization. The purpose of the current study was to define variability across online Latarjet rehabilitation protocols and to compare Latarjet with Bankart repair rehabilitation time lines. Evidence Acquisition: Online searches were utilized to identify publicly available rehabilitation protocols from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited academic orthopaedic surgery programs. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Results: Of the 183 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic programs reviewed, 14 institutions (7.65%) had publicly available rehabilitation protocols. A web-based search yielded 17 additional protocols from private sports medicine practices. Of the 31 protocols included, 31 (100%) recommended postoperative sling use and 26 (84%) recommended elbow, wrist, and hand range of motion exercises. Full passive forward flexion goals averaged 3.22 +/- 2.38 weeks postoperatively, active range of motion began on average at 5.22 +/- 1.28 weeks, and normal scapulothoracic motion by 9.26 +/- 4.8 weeks postoperatively. Twenty (65%) protocols provided specific recommendations for return to nonoverhead sport-specific activities, beginning at an average of 17 +/- 2.8 weeks postoperatively. This was compared with overhead sports or throwing activities, for which 18 (58%) of protocols recommended beginning at a similar average of 17.1 +/- 3.3 weeks. Conclusion: Similar to Bankart repair protocols, Latarjet rehabilitation protocols contain a high degree of variability with regard to exercises and motion goal recommendations. However, many milestones and start dates occur earlier in Latarjet protocols when compared with Bankart-specific protocols. Consequently, variability in the timing of rehabilitation goals may contribute to earlier return to play metrics identified in the broader literature for the Latarjet procedure when compared with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): Level C.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 131
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)-computed tomography evaluation at a short term follow-up. Part II
    Kordasiewicz, Bartlomiej
    Kicinski, Maciej
    Malachowski, Konrad
    Wieczorek, Janusz
    Chaberek, Slawomir
    Pomianowski, Stanislaw
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (05) : 1119 - 1128
  • [42] Management of an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion: arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair versus Latarjet procedure
    Cho, Nam Su
    Yoo, Jae Hyun
    Rhee, Yong Girl
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (12) : 3793 - 3800
  • [43] Arthroscopic Bankart repair with or without remplissage: a single-institution cost comparison
    Gennaro DelliCarpini
    Michael Moore
    Wendell Cole
    Samuel Montgomery
    Spencer Stein
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 35 (1)
  • [44] Coracoid bone block versus arthroscopic Bankart repair: A comparative paired study with 5-year follow-up
    Bessiere, C.
    Trojani, C.
    Pelegri, C.
    Carles, M.
    Boileau, P.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2013, 99 (02) : 123 - 130
  • [45] Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport
    Blonna, Davide
    Bellato, Enrico
    Caranzano, Francesco
    Assom, Marco
    Rossi, Roberto
    Castoldi, Filippo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12) : 3198 - 3205
  • [46] Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure for the Treatment of Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability: Patients With Prior Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Primary Cases
    Werthel, Jean-David
    Sabatier, Vincent
    Schoch, Bradley
    Amsallem, Lior
    Vigan, Marie
    Hardy, Alexandre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [47] Comparing postoperative proprioception of the glenohumeral joint between the open and the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure
    Lallemand, Geoffroi
    Soares, Madu N.
    Lante, Erica
    Macken, Arno A.
    Kling, Agathe
    Lafosse, Laurent
    Buijze, Geert A.
    Lafosse, Thibault
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (12) : 2886 - 2892
  • [48] Open Bankart repair with suture anchors for traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability: comparison of results between small and large Bankart lesions
    Lai, D
    Ma, HL
    Hung, SC
    Chen, TH
    Wu, JJ
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [49] Comparison of the clinical results of isolated Bankart and SLAP 5 lesions after arthroscopic repair
    Sarikaya, Baran
    Bozkurt, Celal
    Gul, Orkun
    Sarikaya, Pelin Zeynep Bekin
    Sipahioglu, Serkan
    Altay, Mehmet Akif
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 31 (02) : 223 - 229
  • [50] Biomechanical analysis of anterior stability after 15% glenoid bone loss: comparison of Bankart repair, dynamic anterior stabilization, dynamic anterior stabilization with Bankart repair, and Latarjet
    Nicholson, Allen D.
    Carey, Edward G.
    Mathew, Joshua I.
    Pinnamaneni, Sridhar
    Jahandar, Amirhossein
    Kontaxis, Andreas
    Dines, David M.
    Dines, Joshua S.
    Blaine, Theodore A.
    Fu, Michael C.
    Rodeo, Scott A.
    Warren, Russell F.
    V. Gulotta, Lawrence
    Taylor, Samuel A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (11) : 2358 - 2365