Systematic Studies of the Circadian Clock Genes Impact on Temperature Compensation and Cell Proliferation Using CRISPR Tools

Simple Summary One of the major characteristics of the circadian clock is temperature compensation, and previous studies suggested a single clock gene may determine the temperature compensation. In this study, we report the first full collection of clock gene knockout cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9 tools. Our full collections indicate that the temperature compensation is a complex gene regulation system instead of being regulated by any single gene. Besides, we systematically compared the proliferation rates and circadian periods using our full collections, and we found that the cell growth rate is not dependent on the circadian period. Therefore, complex interaction between clock genes and their protein products may underlie the mechanism of temperature compensation, which needs further investigations. Mammalian circadian genes are capable of producing a self-sustained, autonomous oscillation whose period is around 24 h. One of the major characteristics of the circadian clock is temperature compensation. However, the mechanism underlying temperature compensation remains elusive. Previous studies indicate that a single clock gene may determine the temperature compensation in several model organisms. In order to understand the influence of each individual clock gene on the temperature compensation, twenty-three well-known mammalian clock genes plus Timeless and Myc genes were knocked out individually, using a powerful gene-editing tool, CRISPR/Cas9. First, Bmal1, Cry1, and Cry2 were knocked out as examples to verify that deleting genes by CRISPR is effective and precise. Cell lines targeting twenty-two genes were successfully edited in mouse fibroblast NIH3T3 cells, and off-target analysis indicated these genes were correctly knocked out. Through measuring the luciferase reporters, the circadian periods of each cell line were recorded under two different temperatures, 32.5 degrees C and 37 degrees C. The temperature compensation coefficient Q(10) was subsequently calculated for each cell line. Estimations of the Q(10) of these cell lines showed that none of the individual cell lines can adversely affect the temperature compensation. Cells with a longer period at lower temperature tend to have a shorter period at higher temperature, while cells with a shorter period at lower temperature tend to be longer at higher temperature. Thus, the temperature compensation is a fundamental property to keep cellular homeostasis. We further conclude that the temperature compensation is a complex gene regulation system instead of being regulated by any single gene. We also estimated the proliferation rates of these cell lines. After systematically comparing the proliferation rates and circadian periods, we found that the cell growth rate is not dependent on the circadian period.