Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: treatment outcomes from a single institutional experience

被引:16
|
作者
Al-Husaini, H. [1 ]
Soudy, H. [1 ,2 ]
Darwish, A. [3 ]
Ahmed, M. [1 ,2 ]
Eltigani, A. [4 ]
Edesa, W. [2 ]
Elhassan, T. [1 ]
Omar, A. [1 ]
Elghamry, W. [5 ]
Al-Hashem, H. [6 ]
Al-Hayli, S. [1 ]
Madkhali, I. [1 ]
Ahmad, S. [7 ]
Al-Badawi, I. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, King Faisal Canc Ctr, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
[2] Cairo Univ, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Dr Soliman Fakeeh Hosp, Dept Oncol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[4] Natl Guard Hosp, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Ain Shams Univ, Cairo, Egypt
[6] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[7] Florida Hosp Canc Inst, Orlando, FL 32804 USA
关键词
Gestational trophoblastic disease; Chemotherapy; treatment; Survival; Clinical outcomes; Salvage therapy; ACTINOMYCIN-D; MOLAR PREGNANCY; TUMORS; CHEMOTHERAPY; METHOTREXATE; DISEASE; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; ETOPOSIDE;
D O I
10.1007/s12094-014-1251-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To report the outcomes of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) at a single institution and to determine the factors affecting response to chemotherapy and survival. From 1979-2010, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 221 patients treated at our center. GTN Patients were assigned to low-risk (score a parts per thousand currency sign6) or high-risk (score a parts per thousand yen7) based on the WHO risk factor scoring system. Overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression was applied to study the impact of different factors on the response to initial therapy. Patients' OS rate was 97 %. Median age at diagnosis was 37 year. 131 (59 %) patients had low-risk and 88 (40 %) cases had high-risk GTN. Complete remission rates to initial chemotherapy in low-risk group were 53 % and 87 % for single-agent methotrexate or dactinomycin, respectively. In high-risk group, 94 % achieved complete remission to initial chemotherapy with etoposide, methotrexate, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine (EMA-CO). Etoposide, cisplatin, and dactinomycin as primary therapy in high-risk patients was successful in 70 %, while bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) was successful in 53 % of cases. Salvage chemotherapy, surgical intervention or radiation therapy resulted in overall complete remission of 90 % in low-risk and 73 % in high-risk groups. Factors associated with resistance to initial chemotherapy were advanced-stage III/IV (p = 0.005), metastatic site other than lung or vagina (p = 0.005) and high-risk prognostic score (p = 0.05). OS was significantly influenced by the type of antecedent pregnancy (molar 98 % vs. others 93 %; p = 0.04), FIGO stage (I, II 100 % vs. III, IV 94 %; p = 0.02), score (low-risk 100 % vs. high-risk 92 %; p = 0.01), and site of metastasis (lung/vagina 98 % vs. others 85 %; p = 0.002). GTNs have excellent prognosis if properly treated at experienced centers. Single-agent dactinomycin seems more effective for low-risk GTN. EMA-CO remains the preferred primary treatment regimen for high-risk group. The excellent outcome reflects the success of salvage therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 415
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: treatment outcomes from a single institutional experience
    H. Al-Husaini
    H. Soudy
    A. Darwish
    M. Ahmed
    A. Eltigani
    W. Edesa
    T. Elhassan
    A. Omar
    W. Elghamry
    H. Al-Hashem
    S. Al-Hayli
    I. Madkhali
    S. Ahmad
    I. A. Al-Badawi
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2015, 17 : 409 - 415
  • [2] EMA vs EMACO in the treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Jareemit, Nida
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    Goldstein, Donald P.
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    Elias, Kevin M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 158 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [3] Retrospective Analysis of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: Single Center Experience
    Sunar, Veli
    Korkmaz, Vakkas
    Arik, Zafer
    Ozdal, Bulent
    Engin Ustun, Yaprak
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2019, 29 (03): : 168 - 175
  • [4] Management of Drug Resistant Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Patel, Shilpa M.
    Desai, Ava
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 55 (7-8) : 296 - 300
  • [5] Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Osborne, R.
    Dodge, J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 39 (02) : 195 - +
  • [6] EMACO for treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A multinational multicenter study
    Jareemit, Nida
    Therasakvichya, Suwanit
    Freitas, Fernanda
    Paiva, Gabriela
    Ramirez, Luz Angela Correa
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    Maesta, Izildinha
    Fulop, Vilmos
    Braga, Antonio
    Elias, Kevin M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 170 : 114 - 122
  • [7] Outcome of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in India
    Gulia, S.
    Bajpai, J.
    Gupta, S.
    Maheshwari, A.
    Deodhar, K.
    Kerkar, R. A.
    Seth, V.
    Rekhi, B.
    Menon, S.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [8] Treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Winter, Matthew C.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 74 : 67 - 80
  • [9] Comparing cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy with EMA/CO chemotherapy for the treatment of high risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Lybol, C.
    Thomas, C. M. G.
    Blanken, E. A.
    Sweep, F. C. G. J.
    Verheijen, R. H.
    Westermann, A. M.
    Boere, I. A.
    Reyners, A. K. L.
    Massuger, L. F. A. G.
    van Hoesel, R. Q. G. C. M.
    Ottevanger, P. B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (04) : 860 - 867
  • [10] Treatments and outcomes in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Albright, Benjamin B.
    Ellett, Tressa
    Knochenhauer, Hope E.
    Goins, Emily C.
    Monuszko, Karen A.
    Kaplan, Samantha J.
    Previs, Rebecca A.
    Moss, Haley A.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Davidson, Brittany A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 (05) : 443 - 453