Child safety in policy: Who is being kept safe and from what?

被引:13
作者
Powell, Mary Ann [1 ]
Graham, Anne [2 ]
Canosa, Antonia [2 ]
Anderson, Donnah [3 ]
Moore, Tim [4 ]
Robinson, Sally [5 ]
Thomas, Nigel P. [6 ]
Taylor, Nicola [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Moray House Sch Educ, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Southern Cross Univ, Ctr Children & Young People, Locked Mail Bag 4, Coolangatta, Qld 4225, Australia
[3] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Psychol, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ South Australia, Australian Ctr Child Protect, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Univ Cent Lancashire, Ctr Children & Young Peoples Participat, Sch Social Work, Preston, Lancs, England
[7] Univ Otago, Childrens Issues Ctr, Fac Law, Dunedin, New Zealand
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
child safe; children; policy; protection; rights; safeguarding; YOUNG-PEOPLE; PROTECTION; CONTEXT; TOUCH; EDUCATION; TEACHERS; SCHOOLS;
D O I
10.1111/spol.12591
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Keeping children safe from harm is a national policy priority in Australia. Extensive inquiries and reviews have highlighted institutions' persistent failures to respond ethically and appropriately to child abuse and its life-long impacts on survivors. Policy efforts now reflect considerable emphasis on safeguarding children, including through the development of 'child safe' organisations. The realisation of these policy aspirations requires close attention to how 'child safe' is conceptualised and operationalised in different organisational contexts. Drawing on an analysis of policy in Australia and other international jurisdictions, namely New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Ireland, this article engages critically with the notion of 'child safe' in policy, to explore who is to be safe, from what and how, in organisational settings. The findings suggest emergent discourses of 'child safe' are bound up with particular constructions of both children and safety, reflect current social and political understandings and agendas, and have implications for organisations' approaches to safety. Ensuring the safety of children in Australia and other jurisdictions requires continuing scrutiny of policy implementation to make sure current policy efforts are not reduced to compliance-based imperatives that protect organisations, but fail to create the cultural conditions that enhance children's wellbeing and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:1160 / 1178
页数:19
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Physical education teaching as a caring acttechniques of bodily touch and the paradox of caring [J].
Andersson, Joacim ;
Ohman, Marie ;
Garrison, Jim .
SPORT EDUCATION AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (06) :591-606
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, The life they deserve: child protection systems Royal Commission Report (0994269323
[3]  
[Anonymous], NAT CHILDR STRAT 200
[4]  
[Anonymous], RURAL SPECIAL ED Q
[5]  
[Anonymous], NAT PLAN RED VIOL WO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Oxford English Dictionary Online
[7]  
Australian Children's Commissioners and Guardians, 2013, PRINC CHILD SAF ORG
[8]  
Australian Government Department of Social Services, GUID BUILD CAP CHILD
[9]  
Australian Human Rights Commission, 2018, National principles for child safe organizations
[10]  
Bacci C., 2012, ENGAGING CAROL BACCI