Intrapartum management of twin pregnancies: are uncomplicated monochorionic pregnancies more at risk of complications than dichorionic pregnancies?

被引:21
作者
Garabedian, Charles [1 ,2 ]
Poulain, Chloe [1 ]
Duhamel, Alain [3 ]
Subtil, Damien [1 ]
Houfflin-Debarge, Veronique [1 ,2 ]
Deruelle, Philippe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jeanne Flandre Hosp, Dept Obstet, Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, Fac Med, Unit EA Perinatal Environm & Growth 4489, Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille, Dept Biostat, Unit EA2694, Lille, France
关键词
Chorionicity; morbidity; perinatal mortality; pregnancy; twin; mode of delivery; cesarean section; PERINATAL-MORTALITY; RETROSPECTIVE-COHORT; TRANSFUSION SYNDROME; FETOPLACENTAL TRANSFUSION; BREECH PRESENTATION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; CESAREAN-SECTION; FETAL-GROWTH; MODE; TERM;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12558
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo analyze mode of delivery and neonatal morbidity according to chorionicity in a hospital birth center with a policy of vaginal delivery for twins. Study designRetrospective analysis over a 13-year period. SettingDepartment of Obstetrics, University Hospital, Lille, France. PopulationIn all, 1009 twin pregnancies were included, divided into 171 uncomplicated monochorionic pregnancies (17%) and 838 dichorionic pregnancies (83%). MethodsWe compared the monochorionic and the dichorionic populations. Main outcome measuresRate of cesarean section and neonatal outcome (umbilical artery pH, Apgar score and neonatal complications). ResultsThe rate of cesarean sections was 45.7% with no difference found based on chorionicity. The reasons for elective cesarean section were mainly noncephalic presentation, which was more frequent in dichorionic than in monochorionic (48.8% vs. 37.2%, p=0.025) pregnancies. Birthweight was lower in monochorionic twins (2249469g vs. 2329 +/- 478g, p=0.045). The rate of umbilical artery cord blood values with a pH<7.10 was similar in monochorionic and dichorionic pregnancies. There was no difference in neonatal complications between the two groups. ConclusionMonochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies had similar delivery outcomes. The neonatal outcome for twin 2 was not different between monochorionic and dichorionic pregnancies. Vaginal birth could be offered to women with twin pregnancies regardless of chorionicity.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 307
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Determinants of perinatal mortality and serious neonatal morbidity in the second twin [J].
Armson, B. Anthony ;
O'Connell, Colleen ;
Persad, Vidia ;
Joseph, K. S. ;
Young, David C. ;
Baskett, Thomas F. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (03) :556-564
[2]   A Randomized Trial of Planned Cesarean or Vaginal Delivery for Twin Pregnancy [J].
Barrett, Jon F. R. ;
Hannah, Mary E. ;
Hutton, Eileen K. ;
Willan, Andrew R. ;
Allen, Alexander C. ;
Armson, B. Anthony ;
Gafni, Amiram ;
Joseph, K. S. ;
Mason, Dalah ;
Ohlsson, Arne ;
Ross, Susan ;
Sanchez, J. Johanna ;
Asztalos, Elizabeth V. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (14) :1295-1305
[3]   Mode of delivery in non-cephalic presenting twins: a systematic review [J].
Bisschop, Charlotte N. Steins ;
Vogelvang, Tatjana E. ;
May, Anne M. ;
Schuitemaker, Nico W. E. .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (01) :237-247
[4]   Placental angioarchitecture in monochorionic twin pregnancies: Relationship to fetal growth, fetofetal transfusion syndrome, and pregnancy outcome [J].
Denbow, ML ;
Cox, P ;
Taylor, M ;
Hammal, DM ;
Fisk, NM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (02) :417-426
[5]   Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study [J].
Hack, K. E. A. ;
Derks, J. B. ;
Elias, S. G. ;
Franx, A. ;
Roos, E. J. ;
Voerman, S. K. ;
Bode, C. L. ;
Koopman-Esseboom, C. ;
Visser, G. H. A. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (01) :58-67
[6]   Perinatal mortality and mode of delivery in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies ≥32 weeks of gestation: a multicentre retrospective cohort study [J].
Hack, K. E. A. ;
Derks, J. B. ;
Elias, S. G. ;
van Mameren, F. A. ;
Koopman-Esseboom, C. ;
Mol, B. W. J. ;
Lopriore, E. ;
Schaap, A. H. P. ;
Arabin, B. ;
Duvekot, J. J. ;
Go, A. T. J. I. ;
Wieselmann, E. ;
Eggink, A. J. ;
Willekes, C. ;
Vandenbussche, F. P. H. A. ;
Visser, G. H. A. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (09) :1090-1097
[7]   INUTERO ANALYSIS OF FETAL GROWTH - A SONOGRAPHIC WEIGHT STANDARD [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
MARTINEZPOYER, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (01) :129-133
[8]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383
[9]  
Haute Autorit? de Sant?, 2009, J GYNECOL OBSTET B S, V38, pS128
[10]   Twin births: cesarean section or vaginal delivery? [J].
Hoffmann, Elise ;
Oldenburg, Anna ;
Rode, Line ;
Tabor, Ann ;
Rasmussen, Steen ;
Skibsted, Lillian .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 (04) :463-469