Colonoscopy uptake for high-risk individuals with a family history of colorectal neoplasia A multicenter, randomized trial of tailored counseling versus standard information

被引:29
作者
Ingrand, Isabelle [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Defossez, Gautier [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Richer, Jean-Pierre [4 ]
Tougeron, David [5 ]
Palierne, Nicolas [6 ]
Letard, Jean-Christophe [7 ]
Beauchant, Michel [6 ]
Ingrand, Pierre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] INSERM, CIC 1402, Poitiers, France
[2] Univ Poitiers, Unite Epidemiol & Biostat, Registre Canc Poitou Charentes, Poitiers, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Poitiers, Pole Sante Publ, Poitiers, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ Poitiers, Serv Chirurg Digest, Poitiers, France
[5] Ctr Hosp Univ Poitiers, Serv Hepatogastroenterol, Poitiers, France
[6] Polyclin Poitiers, GRESCO, Poitiers, France
[7] Polyclin Poitiers, CREGG, Club Reflex Cabinets & Grp Gastroenterologues, Poitiers, France
关键词
colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; first-degree relative; screening; tailored intervention; SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; SCREENING PARTICIPATION; CANCER PATIENTS; INTERVENTIONS; SURVEILLANCE; TELEPHONE; RELATIVES; ADENOMAS; SIBLINGS; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000004303
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Colonoscopic screening is recommended for first-degree relatives of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) or colorectal adenomatous polyps (CAP) before the age of 60 years. This has the potential to reduce CRC-related morbidity and mortality, but uptake is currently inadequate. Methods: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of standard information versus a nurse-led tailored intervention designed to promote uptake of colonoscopy screening by siblings of CRC or CAP patients. A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Digestive surgeons and gastroenterologists recruited index patients who developed CRC or CAP before the age of 60 years. All index patients received standard screening information for their siblings, in keeping with current guidelines. Centrally computerized randomization of index patients resulted in allocating all their siblings to the same group, intervention or control. The tailored intervention targeted the index patient first, to help them convey information to their siblings. The nurse then provided the siblings with tailored information based on their answers to a self-questionnaire which explored health behaviors, derived from psychosocial models of prevention. Then the siblings were given a personalized information leaflet to hand to their regular physician. The primary endpoint was the rate of documented colonoscopy performed in siblings within 1 year after diagnosis of the index patient. The intent-to-treat analysis included siblings who refused to participate in the study. Statistical analysis was adjusted for intrafamilial correlation. Results: A total of 304 siblings of 125 index patients were included: 160 in the intervention group and 144 in the control group. The rate of colonoscopy uptake among siblings was 56.3% in the intervention group and 35.4% in the control group (P=0.0027). The respective rates after exclusion of refusals were 69.2% and 37.0% (P<0.0001). More lesions were detected in the intervention group (1 invasive cancer and 11 advanced adenomas vs 5 advanced adenomas; P=0.022). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a nurse-led tailored intervention designed to promote colonoscopy screening uptake by siblings of patients diagnosed with CRC or CAP before age 60 years. Such tailored interventions that also involve physicians should help to reduce CRC-related mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
ANAES-Service des recommandations professionnellesEndoscopie digestive basse, 2005, ONCOLOGIE, V7, P70
[3]   Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population [J].
Basch, Charles E. ;
Wolf, Randi L. ;
Brouse, Corey H. ;
Shmukler, Celia ;
Neugut, Alfred ;
DeCarlo, Lawrence I. ;
Shea, Steven .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 96 (12) :2246-2253
[4]   Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: A meta-analysis [J].
Butterworth, AS ;
Higgins, JPT ;
Pharoah, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (02) :216-227
[5]   Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests [J].
Edwards, Adrian G. K. ;
Naik, Gurudutt ;
Ahmed, Harry ;
Elwyn, Glyn J. ;
Pickles, Timothy ;
Hood, Kerry ;
Playle, Rebecca .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (02) :1-96
[6]   Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012 [J].
Ferlay, J. ;
Steliarova-Foucher, E. ;
Lortet-Tieulent, J. ;
Rosso, S. ;
Coebergh, J. W. W. ;
Comber, H. ;
Forman, D. ;
Bray, F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (06) :1374-1403
[7]  
Glanz K., 2009, Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, V4th, P97
[8]   Effects of colon cancer risk counseling for first-degree relatives [J].
Glanz, Karen ;
Steffen, Alana D. ;
Taglialatela, Lauren A. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2007, 16 (07) :1485-1491
[9]  
Ingrand Isabelle, 2008, Patient Prefer Adherence, V2, P47
[10]   General practitioner and specialist views on colonoscopic screening of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients [J].
Ingrand, Isabelle ;
Dujoncquoy, Sarah ;
Beauchant, Michel ;
Letard, Jean-Christophe ;
Migeot, Virginie ;
Ingrand, Pierre .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 33 (3-4) :223-230