A Systematic Approach to Quality Requirement Management in Medical Software

被引:0
作者
Messer-Misak, Karin [1 ]
de Bruin, Jeroen S. [1 ]
Hanke, Sten [1 ]
机构
[1] FH Joanneum Univ Appl Sci GmbH, Inst eHlth, Dept Appl Comp Sci, Graz, Austria
来源
DHEALTH 2020 - BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH AND CARE | 2020年 / 271卷
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
software design; reference standards;
D O I
10.3233/SHTI200088
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The quality requirements for medical software have become increasingly demanding. Several quality standards and models are already in place, but there is a debate on whether these are specific enough for medical software. Moreover, mapping requirements to quality criteria can be challenging but is required throughout the software development process. Objectives: We propose a workflow in which we apply proven methods and tools for systematic collection, analysis, and evaluation of software quality criteria based on the ISO/IEC 25010:2011. Methods: We employ affinity diagrams, Kano analysis and quality function deployment for the systematic requirement development, analysis, and management. Results: We outline a systematic approach on how to use the recommended process when developing medical software. Conclusion: The paper proposes a systematic approach for requirements management that could be used for mapping medical software quality criteria and stakeholder requirements, independent from the quality criteria (and the underlying model) itself.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Design notations for secure software: a systematic literature review [J].
van den Berghe, Alexander ;
Scandariato, Riccardo ;
Yskout, Koen ;
Joosen, Wouter .
SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2017, 16 (03) :809-831
[32]   Software Design and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Mapping Study [J].
Robles-Aguilar, Alfonso ;
Octavio Ocharan-Hernandez, Jorge ;
Sanchez-Garcia, Angel J. ;
Limon, Xavier .
2021 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (CONISOFT 2021), 2021, :132-141
[33]   Software development for flexible management of multiple warehouses [J].
Serbanescu, Liviu .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL LEARNING, 2016, :343-350
[34]   Management of shared context dynamics in software design [J].
Santoro, FM ;
Brézillon, P ;
de Araujo, RM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, :134-139
[35]   Software Systems Engineering programmes a capability approach [J].
Landwehr, Carl ;
Ludewig, Jochen ;
Meersman, Robert ;
Parnas, David Lorge ;
Shoval, Peretz ;
Wand, Yair ;
Weiss, David ;
Weyuker, Elaine .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2017, 125 :354-364
[36]   Software Design using Genetic Quality Components Search [J].
Nikulchev, Evgeny ;
Ilin, Dmitry ;
Gusev, Alexander .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 10 (12) :48-54
[37]   Software Process versus Design Quality Tug of War? [J].
Suryanarayana, Girish ;
Sharma, Tushar ;
Samarthyam, Ganesh .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2015, 32 (04) :7-11
[38]   Using software quality attributes to classify refactoring to patterns [J].
Elish, Karim O. ;
Alshayeb, Mohammad .
Journal of Software, 2012, 7 (02) :408-419
[39]   MIDAS: A Design Quality Assessment Method for Industrial Software [J].
Samarthyam, Ganesh ;
Suryanarayana, Girish ;
Sharma, Tushar ;
Gupta, Shrinath .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE 2013), 2013, :911-920
[40]   Software design pattern selection approaches: A systematic literature review [J].
Naghdipour, Ameneh ;
Hasheminejad, Seyed Mohammad Hossein ;
Barmaki, Roghayeh Leila .
SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2023, 53 (04) :1091-1122