共 32 条
A Fuzzy Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Method
被引:27
作者:
Guo, Sen
[1
,2
]
Qi, Ze
[1
]
机构:
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Changping, Peoples R China
来源:
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Linguistics;
Decision making;
Power systems;
Licenses;
Economics;
Uncertainty;
Sorting;
Fuzzy best-worst method;
group decision-making;
linguistic assessment information;
multi-granular fuzzy linguistic context;
multi-criteria decision-making;
SUPPLIER;
BWM;
D O I:
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3106296
中图分类号:
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号:
0812 ;
摘要:
This paper proposed a novel fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria group decision-making method to solve the group decision-making (GDM) problem with multi-granular linguistic approach, which is an effective and promising technique to tackle this issue. In the proposed method, the selectable multi-granularity linguistic term sets (LTS) are firstly provided for experts to expressed their individual assessment information. Then, the improved fuzzy BWM is employed to calculate the weights of criteria with the form of fuzzy numbers. In current several studies using the BWM for group decision-making, only two unified best and worst criteria are given, which cannot reflect the evaluation of the best and worst criteria by different experts, resulting in the omission of information. Moreover, the difference between the best and worst criteria initially given and the experts' ideas will cause the experts to be inaccurate in the comparison of each criterion. Therefore, in this paper, in order not to omit too much information, each expert will determine the best and the worst criteria. The evaluation information of each expert is integrated into two comparison vectors according to the transformation formula proposed in this paper. What's more, an improved input-based consistency measurement is proposed, which can provide the DMs with a clear guideline on the revision of the inconsistent judgement(s). Finally, two examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:118941 / 118952
页数:12
相关论文