Fast 3D large-angle spin-echo imaging (3D FLASE)

被引:84
作者
Ma, JF [1 ]
Wehrli, FW [1 ]
Song, HK [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV PENN,MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
关键词
large flip angle imaging; spin echo; microscopy; trabecular bone;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.1910350619
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A rapid steady-state 3D spin-echo imaging pulse sequence, based on the principle of nutating the spins by an angle greater than 90 degrees, has been designed and implemented on a clinical 1.5-T whole-body MR scanner. The pulse sequence, denoted fast large-angle spin-echo (FLASE), has been optimized for high-resolution imaging of tissues with short T-2 and T-2*. Features of FLASE include a minimum-phase Shinnar-Le Roux excitation pulse and distribution of phase- and slice-encoding gradients before and after the 180 degrees refocusing pulse to minimize the critical time delay between inversion and restoration of the residual longitudinal magnetization and for minimizing echo time, A Bloch equation analysis, corroborated by experimental data, shows FLASE signal-to-noise to be superior to its closest analog, 3D rapid spin-echo excitation (RASEE) (Jara et al., Magn Reson Medicine 29,528 (1993)), and 3D gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (GRASS). It is demonstrated that with judicious RF phase-cycling and steady state operation, FLASE can produce high-quality microimages free of intravoxel phase dispersion from susceptibility-induced background gradients. The performance of the method is exemplified with ultra high-resolution images of trabecular bone in vitro and in vivo in the human calcaneus and wrist at voxel sizes as low as 98 x 98 x 200 mu m(3). Finally, the contrast behavior of refocused FLASE can be altered by disrupting the steady state analogous to gradient echo imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 910
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Object Segmentation and Ground Truth in 3D Embryonic Imaging
    Rajasekaran, Bhavna
    Uriu, Koichiro
    Valentin, Guillaume
    Tinevez, Jean-Yves
    Oates, Andrew C.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [42] 3D Imaging With Moving Fringe Structured Illumination Microscopy
    Melnikov, Alexandr
    Lun, Daniel P. -K.
    IEEE PHOTONICS JOURNAL, 2022, 14 (03):
  • [43] 3D Correlation Imaging for Localized Phase Disturbance Mitigation
    Pepe, Francesco V.
    D'Angelo, Milena
    PHOTONICS, 2024, 11 (08)
  • [44] MicroCT versus sTSLIM 3D Imaging of the Mouse Cochlea
    Buytaert, Jan A. N.
    Johnson, Shane B.
    Dierick, Manuel
    Salih, Wasil H. M.
    Santi, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 61 (05) : 382 - 395
  • [45] 3D imaging in microfluidics: new holographic methods and devices
    Bianco, V
    Miccio, L.
    Memmolo, P.
    Merola, F.
    Mandracchia, B.
    Cacace, T.
    Mugnano, M.
    Paturzo, M.
    Villone, M.
    Maffettone, P. L.
    Ferraro, P.
    MICROFLUIDICS, BIOMEMS, AND MEDICAL MICROSYSTEMS XVII, 2019, 10875
  • [46] Dose accumulation and 3D imaging with He+ ions
    Giannuzzi, Lucille A.
    JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2015, 33 (01):
  • [47] LASER ABLATION TOMOGRAPHY FOR 3D TISSUE IMAGING AND ANALYSIS
    Lanba, Asheesh
    Hall, Benjamin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2019, VOL 3, 2020,
  • [48] Assessment of deformability of soft plant cells by 3D imaging
    Leverrier, Cassandre
    Moulin, Gabrielle
    Cuvelier, Gerard
    Almeida, Giana
    FOOD STRUCTURE-NETHERLANDS, 2017, 14 : 95 - 103
  • [49] Digital holography for microscopic imaging and 3D shape measurement
    Buehl, Johannes
    Babovsky, Holger
    Grosse, Marcus
    Kiessling, Armin
    Kowarschik, Richard
    HOLOGRAPHY: ADVANCES AND MODERN TRENDS II, 2011, 8074
  • [50] 3D optical imaging of multiple SERS nanotags in cells
    McAughtrie, Sarah
    Lau, Katherine
    Faulds, Karen
    Graham, Duncan
    CHEMICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 4 (09) : 3566 - 3572