Trump vs. Paris: The impact of climate policy on US listed oil and gas firm returns and volatility

被引:105
作者
Diaz-Rainey, Ivan [1 ]
Gehricke, Sebastian A. [1 ]
Roberts, Helen [1 ]
Zhang, Renzhu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Accountancy & Finance, Climate & Energy Finance Grp CEFGrp, POB 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
Climate risk; Oil and gas firms; Option implied volatility; Stranded assets valuation; FOSSIL-FUELS; RESERVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101746
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We explore the stock market and option implied volatility response of the oil and gas industry to four policy events associated with the Paris Agreement and the election of Donald Trump. Our results show that the signing of the Paris Agreement had a large negative impact for the Oil and Gas sector (CAAR -8.4%), with Exploration and Production (CAAR -12.2%) and Drilling (CAAR -10.5%) most severely affected. This is further supported by an increase in implied volatility and by a structural break in option trader sentiment around the signing of the agreement. In general, the Paris Agreement had a much stronger impact on firms that had primarily U.S.-focused operations. Contrary to expectations, the election of Donald Trump and the announced withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris Agreement negatively affected some sub-sectors (integrated and transport) and the sector overall. We attribute this to (1) Trump's policies supporting domestic production (benefitting unlisted independent producers at the expense of listed competitors with import and international assets), and (2) on "We Are Still In" efforts by U.S. states, cities and companies to continue to meet Paris Agreement goals. Overall, our results indicate that investors are pricing current policies when examining climate risk and that, in this respect, the Paris agreement trumped Trump.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Firm Risk and Disclosures about Dispersion of Asset Values: Evidence from Oil and Gas Reserves [J].
Badia, Marc ;
Barth, Mary E. ;
Duro, Miguel ;
Ormazabal, Gaizka .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2020, 95 (01) :1-29
[2]   Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes [J].
Bai, JS ;
Perron, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1998, 66 (01) :47-78
[3]   Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models [J].
Bakshi, G ;
Cao, C ;
Chen, ZW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (05) :2003-2049
[4]  
Bandopadhyaya A., 2008, J BUSINESS EC RES, V6, P27
[5]  
Bank Track, 2020, BANKING CLIMATE CHAN
[6]   Fossil fuel reserves and resources reporting and unburnable carbon: Investigating conflicting accounts [J].
Bebbington, Jan ;
Schneider, Thomas ;
Stevenson, Lorna ;
Fox, Alison .
CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 2020, 66
[7]   PUT CALL RATIOS AND MARKET TIMING EFFECTIVENESS [J].
BILLINGSLEY, RS ;
CHANCE, DM .
JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 1988, 15 (01) :25-28
[8]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[9]  
BNP Paribas, 2019, WELLS WIR WHEELS ERO
[10]   Climate change and credit risk [J].
Capasso, Giusy ;
Gianfrate, Gianfranco ;
Spinelli, Marco .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 266