Cost-Effectiveness of Structural Health Monitoring in Fuselage Maintenance of the Civil Aviation Industry

被引:56
作者
Dong, Ting [1 ]
Kim, Nam H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, POB 116250, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
structural health monitoring; condition-based maintenance; scheduled maintenance; cost-benefit analysis; sensors; payload; WAFER ACTIVE SENSORS; DAMAGE DETECTION; STRAIN SENSOR; LAMB WAVES; AIRCRAFT; DURABILITY; LIFE; PROGNOSTICS; PLACEMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/aerospace5030087
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Although structural health monitoring (SHM) technologies using sensors have dramatically been developed recently, their capability should be evaluated from the perspective of the maintenance industry. As a first step toward utilizing sensors, the objective of the paper is to investigate the possibility of using sensors for inspecting the entire fuselage during C-check. First, we reviewed various sensors for their detection range, detectable damage size, and installed weight, which revealed that the piezoelectric wafer active sensor (PWAS) is the most promising sensor for aircraft SHM. Second, we performed a case study of inspecting the fuselage of Boeing-737NG using PWAS. To maintain the same detecting capability of manual inspection in C-check, we estimated the total number of sensors required. It turned out that utilizing sensors can reduce the maintenance downtime and thus, maintenance cost. However, even with a very conservative estimate, the lifetime cost was significantly increased due to the weight of sensor systems. The cost due to the weight increase was an order of magnitude higher than the cost saved by using SHM. We found that a large number of sensors were required to detect damage at unknown locations, which was the main cause of the weight increase. We concluded that to make SHM cost-effective, it would be necessary either to improve the current sensor technologies so that a less number of sensors are used or to modify the aircraft design concept for SHM.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]   Durability of co-bonded piezoelectric transducers [J].
Moix-Bonet, M. ;
Buethe, I. ;
Bach, M. ;
Fritzen, C. -P. ;
Wierach, P. .
2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM-INTEGRATED INTELLIGENCE: CHALLENGES FOR PRODUCT AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2014, 15 :638-647
[42]   Large Scale Applications Using FBG Sensors: Determination of In-Flight Loads and Shape of a Composite Aircraft Wing [J].
Nicolas, Matthew J. ;
Sullivan, Rani W. ;
Richards, W. Lance .
AEROSPACE, 2016, 3 (03)
[43]  
Pattabhiraman S., 2011, P 52 C AIAA ASME ASC, V2, P900
[44]   Skipping unnecessary structural airframe maintenance using an on-board structural health monitoring system [J].
Pattabhiraman, Sriram ;
Gogu, Christian ;
Kim, Nam H. ;
Haftka, Raphael T. ;
Bes, Christian .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2012, 226 (O5) :549-560
[45]   Real time crack detection using mountable comparative vacuum monitoring sensors [J].
Roach, D. .
SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 5 (04) :317-328
[46]   Lamb wave-mode tuning of piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring [J].
Santoni, Giola B. ;
Yu, Lingyu ;
Xu, Buli ;
Giurgiutiu, Victor .
JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2007, 129 (06) :752-762
[47]  
Staszewski W., 2004, Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures: Smart Sensor Technologies and Signal Processing, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470092866
[48]  
Stehmeier H., 2004, P 2 EUROPEAN WORKSHO, P7
[49]   Damage identification for structural health monitoring using fuzzy pattern recognition [J].
Taha, MMR ;
Lucero, J .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2005, 27 (12) :1774-1783
[50]   Structural health monitoring of composite wing structure during durability test [J].
Takeda, S. ;
Aoki, Y. ;
Ishikawa, T. ;
Takeda, N. ;
Kikukawa, H. .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2007, 79 (01) :133-139