Cost-Effectiveness of Structural Health Monitoring in Fuselage Maintenance of the Civil Aviation Industry

被引:56
作者
Dong, Ting [1 ]
Kim, Nam H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, POB 116250, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
structural health monitoring; condition-based maintenance; scheduled maintenance; cost-benefit analysis; sensors; payload; WAFER ACTIVE SENSORS; DAMAGE DETECTION; STRAIN SENSOR; LAMB WAVES; AIRCRAFT; DURABILITY; LIFE; PROGNOSTICS; PLACEMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/aerospace5030087
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Although structural health monitoring (SHM) technologies using sensors have dramatically been developed recently, their capability should be evaluated from the perspective of the maintenance industry. As a first step toward utilizing sensors, the objective of the paper is to investigate the possibility of using sensors for inspecting the entire fuselage during C-check. First, we reviewed various sensors for their detection range, detectable damage size, and installed weight, which revealed that the piezoelectric wafer active sensor (PWAS) is the most promising sensor for aircraft SHM. Second, we performed a case study of inspecting the fuselage of Boeing-737NG using PWAS. To maintain the same detecting capability of manual inspection in C-check, we estimated the total number of sensors required. It turned out that utilizing sensors can reduce the maintenance downtime and thus, maintenance cost. However, even with a very conservative estimate, the lifetime cost was significantly increased due to the weight of sensor systems. The cost due to the weight increase was an order of magnitude higher than the cost saved by using SHM. We found that a large number of sensors were required to detect damage at unknown locations, which was the main cause of the weight increase. We concluded that to make SHM cost-effective, it would be necessary either to improve the current sensor technologies so that a less number of sensors are used or to modify the aircraft design concept for SHM.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Ackert S., 2013, Aircraft Payload-Range Analysis for Financiers
[2]  
An D, 2011, STRUCT ENG MECH, V37, P427
[3]   Development of life extension strategies for Australian military aircraft, using structural health monitoring of composite repairs and joints [J].
Baker, W ;
Mckenzie, I ;
Jones, R .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2004, 66 (1-4) :133-143
[4]  
Becker Thomas, 2009, IEEE Sensors Journal, V9, P1589, DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2009.2028775
[5]   Toward identifying crack-length-related resonances in acoustic emission waveforms for structural health monitoring applications [J].
Bhuiyan, Md Yeasin ;
Bao, Jingjing ;
Poddar, Banibrata ;
Giurgiutiu, Victor .
STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 17 (03) :577-585
[6]  
Blackshire JL, 2006, AIP CONF PROC, V820, P1694
[7]   Next generation structural health monitoring and its integration into aircraft design [J].
Boller, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2000, 31 (11) :1333-1349
[8]  
Boller C, 2009, Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring
[9]  
CHANG FK, 2005, P 5 INT WORKSH STRUC
[10]  
Choi C.H., 2002, New Vacuum Sensor for Detecting Surface Cracks on Welds, P1