Patient-specific daily updated deep learning auto-segmentation for MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy

被引:23
作者
Li, Zhenjiang [1 ]
Zhang, Wei [2 ]
Li, Baosheng [1 ]
Zhu, Jian [1 ]
Peng, Yinglin [3 ]
Li, Chengze [2 ]
Zhu, Jennifer [4 ]
Zhou, Qichao [2 ,5 ]
Yin, Yong [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shandong First Med Univ & Shandong Acad Med Sci, Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol Phys & Technol, 440 Jiyan Rd, Jinan 250117, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Manteia Technol Co Ltd, 1903,B Tower,Zijin Plaza,1811 Huandao East Rd, Xiamen 361001, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Dept Radiat Oncol,Canc Ctr,Guangdong Key Lab Nasop, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, 8 Edenstone View NW, Calgary, AB T3A 3Z2, Canada
[5] 440 Jiyan Rd, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Deep learning; Online MR; Auto-segmentation; Adaptive radiotherapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; IMPLEMENTATION; ADHERENCE; CANCER; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2022.11.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Deep Learning (DL) technique has shown great potential but still has limited success in online contouring for MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART). This study proposed a patient-specific DL auto-segmentation (DLAS) strategy using the patient's previous images and contours to update the model and improve segmentation accuracy and efficiency for MRgART.Methods and materials: A prototype model was trained for each patient using the first set of MRI and cor-responding contours as inputs. The patient-specific model was updated after each fraction with all the available fractional MRIs/contours, and then used to predict the segmentation for the next fraction. During model training, a variant was fitted under consistency constraints, limiting the differences in the volume, length and centroid between the predictions for the latest MRI within a reasonable range. The model performance was evaluated for both organ-at-risks and tumors auto-segmentation for a total of 6 abdominal/pelvic cases (each with at least 8 sets of MRIs/contours) underwent MRgART through Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and was compared with deformable image registration (DIR) and frozen DL model (no updating after pre-training). The contouring time was also recorded and analyzed.Results: The proposed model achieved superior performance with higher mean DSC (0.90, 95 % CI: 0.88- 0.95), as compared to DIR (0.63, 95 %CI: 0.59-0.68) and frozen DL models (0.74, 95 % CI: 0.71-0.79). As for tumors, the proposed method yielded a median DSC of 0.95, 95 % CI: 0.94-0.97, and a median HD95 of 1.63 mm, 95 % CI: 1.22 mm-2.06 mm. The contouring time was reduced significantly (p < 0.05) using the proposed method (73.4 +/- 6.5 secs) compared to the manual process (12 ti 22 mins). The online ART time was reduced to 1650 +/- 274 seconds with the proposed method, as compared to 3251.8 +/- 447 seconds using the original workflow.Conclusion: The proposed patient-specific DLAS method can significantly improve the segmentation accuracy and efficiency for longitudinal MRIs, thereby facilitating the routine practice of MRgART.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 177 (2022) 222-230 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 230
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Assessing the feasibility of adaptive planning for prostate radiotherapy using Smartadapt deformable image registration
    Anaya, Virginia Marin
    Fairfoul, Jamie
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2019, 64 : 65 - 73
  • [2] MMFNet: A multi-modality MRI fusion network for segmentation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Chen, Huai
    Qi, Yuxiao
    Yin, Yong
    Li, Tengxiang
    Liu, Xiaoqing
    Li, Xiuli
    Gong, Guanzhong
    Wang, Lisheng
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2020, 394 : 27 - 40
  • [3] Accuracy of automatic deformable structure propagation for high-field MRI guided prostate radiotherapy
    Christiansen, Rasmus Lubeck
    Dysager, Lars
    Bertelsen, Anders Smedegaard
    Hansen, Olfred
    Brink, Carsten
    Bernchou, Uffe
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [4] A novel MRI segmentation method using CNN-based correction network for MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Fu, Yabo
    Mazur, Thomas R.
    Wu, Xue
    Liu, Shi
    Chang, Xiao
    Lu, Yonggang
    Li, H. Harold
    Kim, Hyun
    Roach, Michael C.
    Henke, Lauren
    Yang, Deshan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (11) : 5129 - 5137
  • [5] Body MRI artifacts in clinical practice: A physicist's and radiologist's perspective
    Graves, Martin J.
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 38 (02) : 269 - 287
  • [6] Initial clinical experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for liver metastases, primary liver malignancy, and pancreatic cancer with 4D-MRI based online adaptation and real-time MRI monitoring using a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac
    Hal, William A.
    Straza, Michael W.
    Chen, Xinfeng
    Mickevicius, Nikolai
    Erickson, Beth
    Schultz, Chris
    Awan, Musaddiq
    Ahunbay, Ergun
    Li, X. Allen
    Paulson, Eric S.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [7] nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation
    Isensee, Fabian
    Jaeger, Paul F.
    Kohl, Simon A. A.
    Petersen, Jens
    Maier-Hein, Klaus H.
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2021, 18 (02) : 203 - +
  • [8] Test-time adaptable neural networks for robust medical image segmentation
    Karani, Neerav
    Erdil, Ertunc
    Chaitanya, Krishna
    Konukoglu, Ender
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2021, 68
  • [9] Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy
    Kurz, Christopher
    Buizza, Giulia
    Landry, Guillaume
    Kamp, Florian
    Rabe, Moritz
    Paganelli, Chiara
    Baroni, Guido
    Reiner, Michael
    Keall, Paul J.
    van den Berg, Cornelis A. T.
    Riboldi, Marco
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [10] Lamb J, 2017, CUREUS J MED SCIENCE, V9, DOI 10.7759/cureus.1618