Tolerability and clinical safety of Implanon®

被引:74
作者
Blumenthal, Paul D. [1 ]
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina [2 ]
Marintcheva-Petrova, Maya [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Karolinska Inst, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Dept Woman & Child Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Organon, Part Schering Plough, Oss, Netherlands
关键词
Implanon (R); etonogestrel; long-acting hormonal contraception; contraception; safety;
D O I
10.1080/13625180801960012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the tolerability and clinical safety of the subdermal, long-acting hormonal contraceptive Implanon (R). Methods This integrated safety analysis included 11 international studies concerning Implanon (R) (68 mg etonogestrel) of which 10 had a duration of at least two years. Assessments included reports of adverse events (AEs), reasons and rates of discontinuation, insertion/removal complications, and the condition of the implant site. Metabolic and coagulation parameters are briefly discussed to fully describe the clinical safety profile. Results In total 942 women were exposed to Implanon (R) for 24,679 cycles over the course of one to five years. The overall discontinuation rate was 32.7%; the most frequently reported reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (13.9%), bleeding irregularities (10.4%), and planning pregnancy (4.1%). The most commonly reported drug-related AE was headache (15.3%); however, headache was reported in only 1.6% of women as a reason for discontinuation. Insertion and removal times for Implanon (R) were short with few complications, none of which were major. From earlier studies it is known that treatment with Implanon (R) has little effect on metabolic and coagulation parameters. Conclusions Implanon (R) is a well-tolerated and safe method of long-acting hormonal contraception for women.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING AND COPPER-RELEASING (NOVA T) IUDS DURING 5 YEARS OF USE - A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE TRIAL [J].
ANDERSSON, K ;
ODLIND, V ;
RYBO, G .
CONTRACEPTION, 1994, 49 (01) :56-72
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, IMPLANON ETONOGESTRE
[3]   Bone mineral density during long-term use of the progestagen contraceptive implant Implanon® compared to a non-hormonal method of contraception [J].
Beerthuizen, R ;
van Beek, A ;
Massai, R ;
Mäkäräinen, L ;
in't Hout, J ;
Bennink, HC .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (01) :118-122
[4]   Effect of Implanon® and Norplant® subdermal contraceptive implants on serum lipids-a randomized comparative study [J].
Biswas, A ;
Viegas, OAC ;
Roy, AC .
CONTRACEPTION, 2003, 68 (03) :189-193
[5]   Implanon® contraceptive implants:: effects on carbohydrate metabolism [J].
Biswas, A ;
Viegas, OAC ;
Bennink, HJTC ;
Korver, T ;
Ratnam, SS .
CONTRACEPTION, 2001, 63 (03) :137-141
[6]  
Brache V, 2003, Expert Opin Drug Saf, V2, P321
[7]   Levonorgestrel subdermal implants - A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability [J].
Coukell, AJ ;
Balfour, JA .
DRUGS, 1998, 55 (06) :861-887
[8]   Clinical performance of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in routine use by the UK Family Planning and Reproductive Health Research Network: 5-year report [J].
Cox, M ;
Tripp, J ;
Blacksell, S .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2002, 28 (02) :73-77
[9]   SERUM-LIPID PROFILE IN WOMEN USING LEVONORGESTREL CONTRACEPTIVE IMPLANT, NORPLANT-2 [J].
DASH, DS ;
DAS, S ;
NANDA, U ;
TRIPATHY, BB ;
SAMAL, KC .
CONTRACEPTION, 1988, 37 (04) :371-382
[10]   Metabolic effects of implantable steroid contraceptives for women [J].
Dorflinger, LJ .
CONTRACEPTION, 2002, 65 (01) :47-62