Complex global governance and domestic policies: four pathways of influence

被引:190
作者
Bernstein, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Cashore, Benjamin [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Polit Sci, Munk Sch Global Affairs, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Master Global Affairs Program, Munk Sch Global Affairs, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Governance Environm & Markets Initiat, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGIMES; EQUITY; STATE; GLOBALIZATION; LEGITIMACY; FORESTS; MATTER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01090.x
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Standard works on international environmental governance assume single-issue regimes with binding obligations designed to govern the behaviour of states. Yet many of the most pressing global environmental problems, including climate change, forest degradation and biodiversity loss, are governed by an array of mechanismslegal, non-legal, governmental and non-governmentalin complex arrangements. Examining the combined effects of these international and transnational efforts on domestic or firm policies and practicesthe usual targets of such effortsrequires expanding a focus on regime compliance and effectiveness to influence factors from beyond state borders. To facilitate such a move, the authors develop a framework that distinguishes four distinct pathways through which actors and institutions influence domestic policies: international rules; international norms and discourse; creation of, or interventions in, markets; and direct access to domestic policy processes. Propositions are then developed on the conditions under which, and processes through which, actors and institutions affect domestic and firm policies and practices along each pathway. The framework is applied to the case of forest governance, a prototypical example of complex global environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism [J].
Acharya, A .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2004, 58 (02) :239-275
[2]   Environmental equity and the conservation of unique ecosystems: An analysis of the distribution of benefits for protecting southern Appalachian spruce-fir forests [J].
Aldy, JE ;
Kramer, RA ;
Holmes, TP .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1999, 12 (02) :93-106
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, illegal logging and related trade: indicators of the global response
[4]  
Arild Underdal., 1992, COOP CONFL, V27, P227, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0010836792027003001, 10.1177/0010836792027003001]
[5]  
Asch Michael., 1997, ABORIGINAL TREATY RI
[6]  
Atyi R.E. a., 2002, Forest certification: pending challenges for tropical timber
[7]  
Balboa Cristina, 2009, NON GOVT ORG GOVERN
[8]   Power in international politics [J].
Barnett, M ;
Duvall, R .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2005, 59 (01) :39-75
[9]  
BARR Christopher., 2006, DECENTRALIZATION FOR
[10]  
Bass Steven, 2007, PARTICIPATION SUSTAI, P170