Indomethacin-associated bowel perforations: A study of possible risk factors

被引:46
作者
Shorter, NA
Liu, JY
Mooney, DP
Harmon, BJ
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Childrens Hosp, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Childrens Hosp, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
关键词
indomethacin; bowel perforation; prematurity;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3468(99)90495-5
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: The association between indomethacin administration and bowel perforation in premature infants is well known. The goal of this study was to examine possible risk factors for this complication. Methods: Fifteen cases of indomethacin-associated bower perforation occurred from 1993 to 1996. All had a birth weight less than or equal to 1,100 g. These patients were compared with a control group of 51 infants who were cared for contemporaneously, had birth weights less than or equal to 1,100 g and received indomethacin. Results: Survival rate in the control group was 96%. For the group with perforations, it was 53%. Two types of perforation were seen, one occurring in the setting of necrotizing enterocolitis, and the other, a simple perforation in an otherwise normal-appearing bowel. For the latter group, the survival rate was 86%, and, when possible, primary repair was the procedure of choice. Use of aminophylline was greater in the control group. Otherwise, there were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the variables observed. However, when the simple perforations were observed separately, these patients had, on average, received indomethacin at a younger age than the controls (P<.05). The clustering of perforation cases from May through August suggests an infectious agent might be involved. Conclusions: Earlier administration of indomethacin correlates with an increased risk of focal perforation. It is unclear, however, whether the risk factor is the drug itself or the earlier need for it. Aminophylline use was somewhat more in the control group, but this is not likely to reflect a protective role for that drug. The possible involvement of an infectious agent should be considered. Copyright (C) 1999 by W.B. Saunders Company.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 444
页数:3
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] LOCALIZED INTESTINAL PERFORATIONS AFTER ENTERAL ADMINISTRATION OF INDOMETHACIN IN PREMATURE-INFANTS
    ALPAN, G
    EYAL, F
    VINOGRAD, I
    UDASSIN, R
    AMIR, G
    MOGLE, P
    GLICK, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1985, 106 (02) : 277 - 281
  • [2] SPONTANEOUS FOCAL GASTROINTESTINAL PERFORATION IN VERY LOW BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS
    ASCHNER, JL
    DELUGA, KS
    METLAY, LA
    EMMENS, RW
    HENDRICKSMUNOZ, KD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1988, 113 (02) : 364 - 367
  • [3] BARONE MA, 1996, HARRIET LANE HDB
  • [4] INDOMETHACIN-INDUCED BLOOD-FLOW DISTRIBUTION IN PREMATURE AND FULL-TERM PIGLETS
    DYESS, DL
    PEEPLES, GL
    ARDELL, JL
    TACCHI, EJ
    ROBERTS, WS
    FERRARA, JJ
    POWELL, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1993, 28 (10) : 1396 - 1400
  • [5] EFFECTS OF INDOMETHACIN IN PREMATURE-INFANTS WITH PATENT DUCTUS-ARTERIOSUS - RESULTS OF A NATIONAL COLLABORATIVE STUDY
    GERSONY, WM
    PECKHAM, GJ
    ELLISON, RC
    MIETTINEN, OS
    NADAS, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1983, 102 (06) : 895 - 906
  • [6] Giacoia G P, 1993, J Perinatol, V13, P297
  • [7] COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF INDOMETHACIN, PROSTAGLANDIN-E1, AND IBUPROFEN ON BOWEL ISCHEMIA
    GROSFELD, JL
    KAMMAN, K
    GROSS, K
    CIKRIT, D
    ROSS, D
    WOLFE, M
    KATZ, S
    WEBER, TR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1983, 18 (06) : 738 - 742
  • [8] INTESTINAL PERFORATION ASSOCIATED WITH INDOMETHACIN TREATMENT IN PREMATURE-INFANTS
    KUHL, G
    WILLE, L
    BOLKENIUS, M
    SEYBERTH, HW
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1985, 143 (03) : 213 - 216
  • [9] MAYORAL JL, 1991, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V126, P202
  • [10] Indomethacin-induced reduction in neonatal piglet mesenteric blood flow is blunted by dopexamine
    Mero, KA
    Choe, EU
    Flint, LM
    Ferrara, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1998, 33 (05) : 688 - 693