Evaluation of preservation methods for improving biogas production and enzymatic conversion yields of annual crops

被引:78
作者
Pakarinen, Annukka [1 ]
Maijala, Pekka [1 ]
Jaakkola, Seija [2 ]
Stoddard, Frederick L. [2 ]
Kymalainen, Maritta [3 ]
Viikari, Liisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Food & Environm Sci, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Agr Sci, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] HAMK Univ Appl Sci, Hameenlinna 13101, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
ON-FARM PRETREATMENT; PERENNIAL GRASSES; HYDROLYSIS; MAIZE; ACID; DIGESTIBILITY; FERMENTATION; BIOETHANOL; BIOMASS; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1186/1754-6834-4-20
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: The use of energy crops and agricultural residues is expected to increase to fulfil the legislative demands of bio-based components in transport fuels. Ensiling methods, adapted from the feed sector, are suitable storage methods to preserve fresh crops throughout the year for, for example, biogas production. Various preservation methods, namely ensiling with and without acid addition for whole crop maize, fibre hemp and faba bean were investigated. For the drier fibre hemp, alkaline urea treatment was studied as well. These treatments were also explored as mild pretreatment methods to improve the disassembly and hydrolysis of these lignocellulosic substrates. Results: The investigated storage treatments increased the availability of the substrates for biogas production from hemp and in most cases from whole maize but not from faba bean. Ensiling of hemp, without or with addition of formic acid, increased methane production by more than 50% compared to fresh hemp. Ensiling resulted in substantially increased methane yields also from maize, and the use of formic acid in ensiling of maize further enhanced methane yields by 16%, as compared with fresh maize. Ensiled faba bean, in contrast, yielded somewhat less methane than the fresh material. Acidic additives preserved and even increased the amount of the valuable water-soluble carbohydrates during storage, which affected most significantly the enzymatic hydrolysis yield of maize. However, preservation without additives decreased the enzymatic hydrolysis yield especially in maize, due to its high content of soluble sugars that were already converted to acids during storage. Urea-based preservation significantly increased the enzymatic hydrolysability of hemp. Hemp, preserved with urea, produced the highest carbohydrate increase of 46% in enzymatic hydrolysis as compared to the fresh material. Alkaline pretreatment conditions of hemp improved also the methane yields. Conclusions: The results of the present work show that ensiling and alkaline preservation of fresh crop materials are useful pretreatment methods for methane production. Improvements in enzymatic hydrolysis were also promising. While all three crops still require a more powerful pretreatment to release the maximum amount of carbohydrates, anaerobic preservation is clearly a suitable storage and pretreatment method prior to production of platform sugars from fresh crops.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure - Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield [J].
Amon, Thomas ;
Amon, Barbara ;
Kryvoruchko, Vitaliy ;
Zollitsch, Werner ;
Mayer, Karl ;
Gruber, Leonhard .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) :173-182
[2]   Ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) treatment of eleven different forages: Improvements to fiber digestibility in vitro [J].
Bals, Bryan ;
Murnen, Hannah ;
Allen, Michael ;
Dale, Bruce .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 155 (2-4) :147-155
[3]   Ensiling agricultural residues for bioethanol production [J].
Chen, Ye ;
Sharma-Shivappa, Ratna R. ;
Chen, Chengci .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 143 (01) :80-92
[4]   HYDROLYSIS OF GRASS HEMICELLULOSES DURING ENSILAGE [J].
DEWAR, WA ;
WHITTENBURY, R ;
MCDONALD, P .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1963, 14 (06) :411-&
[5]  
Digman MF, 2010, T ASABE, V53, P1007
[6]   Optimizing on-farm pretreatment of perennial grasses for fuel ethanol production [J].
Digman, Matthew F. ;
Shinners, Kevin J. ;
Casler, Michael D. ;
Dien, Bruce S. ;
Hatfield, Ronald D. ;
Jung, Hans-Joachim G. ;
Muck, Richard E. ;
Weimer, Paul J. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (14) :5305-5314
[7]   FEEDSTOCK STORAGE, HANDLING AND PROCESSING [J].
EGG, RP ;
COBLE, CG ;
ENGLER, CR ;
LEWIS, DH .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1993, 5 (01) :71-94
[8]   A COMPARISON OF FABA BEANS AND PEAS AS WHOLE-CROP FORAGES [J].
FAULKNER, JS .
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1985, 40 (02) :161-169
[9]   Urea treatment of whole-crop triticale at four growth stages:: effects on chemical composition and on in vitro digestibility of cell wall [J].
Guedes, CM ;
Rodrigues, MM ;
Gomes, MJ ;
Silva, SR ;
Ferreira, LM ;
Mascarenhas-Ferreira, A .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2006, 86 (06) :964-970
[10]   Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass [J].
Hendriks, A. T. W. M. ;
Zeeman, G. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (01) :10-18