Delayed pain decrease following M1 tDCS in spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:31
|
作者
Thibaut, Aurore [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Carvalho, Sandra [1 ,4 ]
Morse, Leslie R. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Zafonte, Ross [7 ,8 ]
Fregni, Felipe [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Neuromodulat Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[2] Univ Liege, GIGA Res, Coma Sci Grp, Liege, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Liege, Liege, Belgium
[4] Univ Minho, Sch Psychol EPsi, Neuropsychophysiol Lab, CIPsi, Campus Gualtar, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[5] Craig Rehabil Hosp, Rocky Mt Reg Spinal Injury Syst, Englewood, CO USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept PMR, Aurora, CO USA
[7] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Spaulding Harvard SCI Model Syst Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Spinal cord injury; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Pain; Visual analogue scale; Neuromodulation; Central sensitization; DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; INTRINSIC BRAIN CONNECTIVITY; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; DC-STIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL REORGANIZATION; CORTICAL STIMULATION; LIFE SATISFACTION; VISUAL ILLUSION; BACK-PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2017.08.024
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Despite some encouraging findings for the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) directed to the primary motor cortex (M1) has faced some mixed results. Prior to translating this technology to clinical care, consistent results and durable effects need to be found. We, therefore, aimed to assess the direct and long-term effects of tDCS on pain following SCI. We performed a two-phase randomized sham-controlled clinical trial where patients received 5 days of tDCS followed by a 3-month follow-up period (Phase I); then, Phase II consisted of 10 days of tDCS with an 8-week follow-up period. We assessed the level of pain with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients' quality of life and life satisfaction were also evaluated. 33 patients were enrolled in Phase I and 9 in Phase II. We observed a treatment effect at 1-week follow-up for Phase I and at 4-week follow-up for Phase II. The overall level of pain was significantly lower for the active group, as compared to sham, in Phase II. Our exploratory study shows that tDCS does seem to be a promising tool to manage pain in patients with SCI and repeated stimulation sessions are needed to induce long-lasting effects. Based on our protocol, it appears that adding a second treatment period could induce long-lasting effects.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 26
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A pilot randomized clinical trial study on M1 HD-tDCS effect on central μ-opioid receptor availability and pain sensitivity in temporomandibular disorder
    Kim, Dajung
    Nascimento, Thiago
    Lim, Manyoel
    Danciu, Theodora
    Zubieta, Jon-Kar
    Scott, Peter
    Koeppe, Robert
    Kaciroti, Niko
    DaSilva, Alexandre
    CEPHALALGIA, 2023, 43 (1supp) : 272 - 272
  • [32] Durability and delayed treatment effects of zoledronic acid on bone loss after spinal cord injury: a randomized, controlled trial
    Edwards, W. Brent
    Haider, Ifaz T.
    Simonian, Narina
    Barroso, Joana
    Schnitzer, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2021, 36 (11) : 2127 - 2138
  • [33] Randomized-Controlled Trial of Minocycline for Spinal Cord Injury Shows Promise
    Monaco, Edward A., III
    Weiner, Gregory M.
    Friedlander, Robert M.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 (02) : N17 - N19
  • [34] Ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide in spinal cord injury neuropathic pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Andresen, Sven R.
    Bing, Jette
    Hansen, Rikke M.
    Biering-Sorensen, Fin
    Johannesen, Inger L.
    Hagen, Ellen Merete
    Rice, Andrew S. C.
    Nielsen, Jorgen F.
    Bach, Flemming W.
    Finnerup, Nanna B.
    PAIN, 2016, 157 (09) : 2097 - 2103
  • [35] Longstanding neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury is refractory to transcranial direct current stimulation: A randomized controlled trial
    Wrigley, Paul J.
    Gustin, Sylvia M.
    McIndoe, Leigh N.
    Chakiath, Rosemary J.
    Henderson, Luke A.
    Siddall, Philip J.
    PAIN, 2013, 154 (10) : 2178 - 2184
  • [36] RETRACTED: A randomized controlled trial of botulinum toxin A for treating neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury (Retracted Article)
    Li, Gang
    Lv, Chang-an
    Tian, Li
    Jin, Lian-jin
    Sun, Ping
    Zhao, Wei
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (20)
  • [37] Tramadol in Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Norrbrink, Cecilia
    Lundeberg, Thomas
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 25 (03): : 177 - 184
  • [38] A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF METHYLPREDNISOLONE OR NALOXONE IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE SPINAL-CORD INJURY
    SENEGOR, M
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 323 (17): : 1208 - 1208
  • [39] Improving the Quality of Life of Caregivers of Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Schulz, Richard
    Czaja, Sara J.
    Lustig, Amy
    Zdaniuk, Bozena
    Martire, Lynn M.
    Perdomo, Dolores
    REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 54 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [40] Managing pain and fatigue in people with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial feasibility study examining the efficacy of massage therapy
    J Lovas
    Y Tran
    J Middleton
    R Bartrop
    N Moore
    A Craig
    Spinal Cord, 2017, 55 : 162 - 166