Standardizing in vitro diagnostics tasks in clinical trials: a call for action

被引:18
作者
Lippi, Giuseppe [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Simundic, Ana-Maria [1 ,3 ]
Rodriguez-Manas, Leocadio [4 ]
Bossuyt, Patrick [5 ,6 ]
Banfi, Giuseppe [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Working Grp Preanalyt Phase WG PRE, European Federat Clin Chem & Lab Med EFLM, Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Verona, Sect Clin Biochem, Verona, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Sveti Duh, Dept Med Lab Diagnost, Zagreb, Croatia
[4] Hosp Univ Getafe, Dept Geriatr, Getafe, Spain
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol Biostat & Bioinform, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] STARD Stand Reporting Diagnost Accuracy Grp, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] IRCCS Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
[8] Vita & Salute San Raffaele Univ, Milan, Italy
关键词
Clinical trials; quality; preanalytical variability; safety; CHEMISTRY; HEMOLYSIS; INTERFERENCE; GUIDELINES; COLLECTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.21037/atm.2016.04.10
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Translational research is defined as the process of applying ideas, insights and discoveries generated through basic scientific inquiry to treatment or prevention of human diseases. Although precise information is lacking, several lines of evidence attest that up to 95% early-phase studies may not translate into tangible outcomes for improving clinical management. Major theoretical hurdles exist in the translational process, but is it also undeniable that many studies may have failed for practical reasons, such as the use of inappropriate diagnostic testing for evaluating efficacy, effectiveness or safety of a given medical intervention, or poor quality in laboratory testing. This can generate biased test results and result in misconceptions during data interpretation, eventually leading to no clinical benefit, possible harm, and a waste of valuable resources. From a genuine economic perspective, it can be estimated that over 10 million euros of funding may be lost each year in clinical trials in the European Union due to preanalytical and analytical problems. These are mostly attributions to the heterogeneity of current guidelines and recommendations for the testing process, to the poor evidence base for basic preanalytical, analytical and post-analytical requirements in clinical trials, and to the failure to thoughtfully integrate the perspectives of clinicians, patients, nurses and diagnostic companies in laboratory best practices. The most rational means for filling the gap between what we know and what we practice in clinical trials cannot discount the development of multidisciplinary teams including research scientists, clinicians, nurses, patients associations and representative of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) companies, who should actively interplay and collaborate with laboratory professionals to adapt and disseminate evidence-based recommendations about biospecimen collection and management into the research settings, from preclinical to phase III studies.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Standardizing Safety Assessment and Reporting for Neonatal Clinical Trials
    Davis, Jonathan M.
    Baer, Gerri R.
    McCune, Susan
    Klein, Agnes
    Sato, Junko
    Fabbri, Laura
    Mangili, Alexandra
    Short, Mary A.
    Tansey, Susan
    Mangum, Barry
    Hokuto, Isamu
    Nakamura, Hidefumi
    Salaets, Thomas
    Allegaert, Karel
    Yao, Lynne
    Blum, Michael
    Toerner, Joseph
    Turner, Mark
    Portman, Ron
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2020, 219 : 243 - +
  • [2] Improving representativeness in trials: a call to action from the Global Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists Forum
    Filbey, Lynaea
    Zhu, Jie Wei
    D'Angelo, Francesca
    Thabane, Lehana
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Lewis, Eldrin
    Patel, Manesh R.
    Powell-Wiley, Tiffany
    Miranda, J. Jaime
    Zuhlke, Liesl
    Butler, Javed
    Zannad, Faiez
    Van Spall, Harriette G. C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44 (11) : 921 - 930
  • [3] Alter-Standardizing Clinical Trials: The Gold Standard in the Crossfire
    Rosemann, Achim
    SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2019, 28 (02) : 125 - 148
  • [4] Development of clinical pharmacy quality measures: A call to action
    Nesbit, Suzanne A.
    Haas, Curtis E.
    Carter, Barry L.
    Kehoe, William A.
    Jacobi, Judi
    D'Amico, Heather Rucker
    Peace, Jacob T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 5 (03): : 366 - 369
  • [5] Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Clinical Trials A Call for Action!
    Joly, Florence
    McAlpine, Jessica
    Nout, Remi
    Avall-Lundqvist, Elisabeth
    Shash, Emad
    Friedlander, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (09) : 1693 - 1699
  • [6] Inclusion of women in FDA-regulated premarket clinical trials: A call for innovative and recommended action
    Samaei, Mehrnoosh
    McGregor, Alyson J.
    Jenkins, Marjorie R.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 116
  • [7] Mission and tasks of the Coordination Centres for Clinical Trials
    Luntz, S. P.
    Gorbauch, T.
    Schroeder, B.
    Seibert-Grafe, M.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2009, 52 (04) : 444 - 450
  • [8] Measures of sleep are not routinely captured in trials assessing treatment outcomes in knee osteoarthritis - A scoping systematic review and call to action
    Feda, Jessica
    Miller, Tyler
    Young, Jodi L.
    Neilson, Brett
    Rhon, Daniel I.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN, 2023, 5 (04):
  • [9] Under-representation of racial and ethnic minorities in nail psoriasis randomized clinical trials: A call to action
    Ricardo, Jose W.
    Lipner, Shari R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 86 (06) : E267 - E268
  • [10] Clinical Practice Guidelines in an Era of Accountability, Saudi Arabia: A Call for Action
    Abdellatif, Hoda M.
    Al-Muallem, Amani
    Almansoof, Afaf Saleh
    AlRohaily, Sami A.
    Alzahrani, Abdullah
    AlGhodaier, Hussah
    Saeedi, Mohammad
    AlAzemi, Nahar
    Hassan, Imad
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 13 (03) : 391 - 396