Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias

被引:192
作者
Dalton, Derek [1 ]
Ortegren, Marc [2 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Coll Business & Behav Sci, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Robert Morris Univ, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
gender; social desirability response bias; ethics research; DECISION-MAKING; BUSINESS STUDENTS; ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR; SELF-EVALUATION; TRAIT; PERCEPTIONS; ASSESSMENTS; ATTITUDES; VALUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Gender is one of the most frequently studied variables within the ethics literature. In prior studies that find gender differences, females consistently report more ethical responses than males. However, prior research also indicates that females are more prone to responding in a socially desirable fashion. Consequently, it is uncertain whether gender differences in ethical decision-making exist because females are more ethical or perhaps because females are more prone to the social desirability response bias. Using a sample of 30 scenarios from prior studies that find gender differences, we examine whether these gender differences remain robust once social desirability is controlled for in the analysis. Our data suggest that the effect of gender on ethical decision-making is largely attenuated once social desirability is included in the analysis. In essence, the social desirability response bias appears to be driving a significant portion of the relationship between gender and ethical decision-making. We discuss several important research implications of this study.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 93
页数:21
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   GLOBAL SELF-EVALUATION AS DETERMINED BY THE DESIRABILITY AND CONTROLLABILITY OF TRAIT ADJECTIVES [J].
ALICKE, MD .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 49 (06) :1621-1630
[2]   ON BEING BETTER BUT NOT SMARTER THAN OTHERS - THE ALI,MUHAMMAD EFFECT [J].
ALLISON, ST ;
MESSICK, DM ;
GOETHALS, GR .
SOCIAL COGNITION, 1989, 7 (03) :275-295
[3]   Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals [J].
Ameen, EC ;
Guffey, DM ;
McMillan, JJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1996, 15 (05) :591-597
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, MORAL DEV ADV RES TH
[5]  
[Anonymous], J PERSONALITY SOCIAL
[6]  
ARNOLD DF, 1991, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V10, P1
[7]   Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer's wrongdoing [J].
Barnett, T ;
Bass, K ;
Brown, G .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1996, 15 (11) :1161-1174
[8]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[9]  
Bernardi R.A., 2006, Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, V11, P157
[10]   Associations between Hofstede's cultural constructs and social desirability response bias [J].
Bernardi, RA .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2006, 65 (01) :43-53