A regional assessment of land-based carbon mitigation potentials: Bioenergy, BECCS, reforestation, and forest management

被引:20
作者
Krause, Andreas [1 ]
Knoke, Thomas [1 ]
Rammig, Anja [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Life Sci Weihenstephan, Hans Carl von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2020年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
afforestation; BECCS; climate mitigation; land management; land-use change; negative emissions; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CROP YIELDS; ENERGY CROP; MISCANTHUS; BENEFITS; STORAGE; MODEL; SCENARIOS; RECOVERY; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12675
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Land-based solutions are indispensable features of most climate mitigation scenarios. Here we conduct a novel cross-sectoral assessment of regional carbon mitigation potential by running an ecosystem model with an explicit representation of forest structure and climate impacts for Bavaria, Germany, as a case study. We drive the model with four high-resolution climate projections (EURO-CORDEX) for the representative concentration pathway RCP4.5 and present-day land-cover from three satellite-derived datasets (CORINE, ESA-CCI, MODIS) and identify total mitigation potential by not only accounting for carbon storage but also material and energy substitution effects. The model represents the current state in Bavaria adequately, with a simulated forest biomass 12.9 +/- 0.4% lower than data from national forest inventories. Future land-use changes according to two ambitious land-use harmonization scenarios (SSP1xRCP2.6, SSP4xRCP3.4) achieve a mitigation of 206 and 247 Mt C (2015-2100 period) via reforestation and the cultivation and burning of dedicated bioenergy crops, partly combined with carbon capture and storage. Sensitivity simulations suggest that converting croplands or pastures to bioenergy plantations could deliver a carbon mitigation of 40.9 and 37.7 kg C/m(2), respectively, by the year 2100 if used to replace carbon-intensive energy systems and combined with CCS. However, under less optimistic assumptions (including no CCS), only 15.3 and 12.2 kg C/m(2) are mitigated and reforestation might be the better option (20.0 and 16.8 kg C/m(2)). Mitigation potential in existing forests is limited (converting coniferous into mixed forests, nitrogen fertilization) or even negative (suspending wood harvest) due to decreased carbon storage in product pools and associated substitution effects. Our simulations provide guidelines to policy makers, farmers, foresters, and private forest owners for sustainable and climate-benefitting ecosystem management in temperate regions. They also emphasize the importance of the CCS technology which is regarded critically by many people, making its implementation in the short or medium term currently doubtable.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 360
页数:15
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Carbon implications of converting cropland to bioenergy crops or forest for climate mitigation: a global assessment [J].
Albanito, Fabrizio ;
Beringer, Tim ;
Corstanje, Ronald ;
Poulter, Benjamin ;
Stephenson, Anna ;
Zawadzka, Joanna ;
Smith, Pete .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (01) :81-95
[2]  
Bayerisches Staatsministerium fur Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz, 2017, BAYER KLIM ANP 2016, P222
[3]  
Bui M, 2018, ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V11, P1062, DOI [10.1039/c7ee02342a, 10.1039/C7EE02342A]
[4]   Projecting Tree Species Composition Changes of European Forests for 2061-2090 Under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 Scenarios [J].
Buras, Allan ;
Menzel, Annette .
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 9
[5]   Global patterns of terrestrial biological nitrogen (N2) fixation in natural ecosystems [J].
Cleveland, CC ;
Townsend, AR ;
Schimel, DS ;
Fisher, H ;
Howarth, RW ;
Hedin, LO ;
Perakis, SS ;
Latty, EF ;
Von Fischer, JC ;
Elseroad, A ;
Wasson, MF .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1999, 13 (02) :623-645
[6]   Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus [J].
Clifton-Brown, John C. ;
Breuer, Joeern ;
Jones, Michael B. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2007, 13 (11) :2296-2307
[7]   Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment [J].
Creutzig, Felix ;
Ravindranath, N. H. ;
Berndes, Goran ;
Bolwig, Simon ;
Bright, Ryan ;
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Chum, Helena ;
Corbera, Esteve ;
Delucchi, Mark ;
Faaij, Andre ;
Fargione, Joseph ;
Haberl, Helmut ;
Heath, Garvin ;
Lucon, Oswaldo ;
Plevin, Richard ;
Popp, Alexander ;
Robledo-Abad, Carmenza ;
Rose, Steven ;
Smith, Pete ;
Stromman, Anders ;
Suh, Sangwon ;
Masera, Omar .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2015, 7 (05) :916-944
[8]   Balancing the environmental benefits of reforestation in agricultural regions [J].
Cunningham, S. C. ;
Mac Nally, R. ;
Baker, P. J. ;
Cavagnaro, T. R. ;
Beringer, J. ;
Thomson, J. R. ;
Thompson, R. M. .
PERSPECTIVES IN PLANT ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2015, 17 (04) :301-317
[9]   Reconsidering bioenergy given the urgency of climate protection [J].
DeCicco, John M. ;
Schlesinger, William H. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (39) :9642-9645
[10]   Direct contribution of nitrogen deposition to nitrous oxide emissions in a temperate beech and spruce forest - a 15N tracer study [J].
Eickenscheidt, N. ;
Brumme, R. ;
Veldkamp, E. .
BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2011, 8 (03) :621-635