French general practitioners' and patients' acceptability of a public commitment charter and patient information leaflets targeting unnecessary antibiotic use: a qualitative study

被引:1
作者
Essilini, Anais [1 ]
Le Dref, Gaelle [1 ]
Bocquier, Aurelie [1 ]
Kivits, Joelle [1 ]
Welter, Adeline [2 ]
Pulcini, Celine [1 ,3 ]
Thilly, Nathalie [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France
[2] Caisse Primaire Assurance Maladie Bas Rhin, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[3] Univ Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, Serv Malad Infect & Trop, F-54000 Nancy, France
[4] Univ Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, Dept Methodol Promot Invest, F-54000 Nancy, France
关键词
Primary care; Antibiotic resistance; General practitioner; Qualitative study; Education; Antimicrobial stewardship; Patient; Intervention; Commitment charter; Non-prescription pad; STEWARDSHIP; COMMUNICATION; EXPECTATIONS; FRANCE; PARENT;
D O I
10.1186/s13756-022-01065-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The 'AntibioCharte' randomised controlled study aimed at assessing the impact of a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention targeting French general practitioners with higher-than-average antibiotic use. The intervention included a public commitment charter signed by the general practitioner, a non-prescription pad, and a patient information leaflet. Objectives We conducted a qualitative study to evaluate general practitioners' fidelity in the intervention and its acceptability by patients and general practitioners. Methods This investigation was performed in northeastern France from July 2019 to May 2020, among the AntibioCharte intervention group after a 1-year implementation period. General practitioners' fidelity in the charter was assessed by direct observations; general practitioners' fidelity in the other tools, and acceptability of both general practitioners and patients were assessed through semi-structured face-to-face individual interviews. Results Twenty-seven general practitioners and 14 patients participated. General practitioners' fidelity varied according to the tool: the charter was clearly displayed in most waiting rooms; the non-prescription pad was used throughout the intervention period by most general practitioners while the leaflet was used by fewer general practitioners. Both general practitioners and patients found the charter's content and form relevant, but few general practitioners felt themselves publicly engaged. The waiting room may not be appropriate to display the charter as some general practitioners forgot it and patients did not always read the displayed documents. General practitioners appreciated the pad and found that it could help them change their practices. It was perceived as a good tool to educate patients and manage their expectations for antibiotics. Patients appreciated the pad too, especially information on the infections' symptoms and their duration. Still, some patients feared that it could encourage doctors not to prescribe antibiotics. Unlike general practitioners, who considered the leaflet redundant with the information given during the consultation, patients found it useful to raise awareness on antibiotics' specificities and risks, and remind them of good practices. Conclusions The AntibioCharte intervention was overall well accepted by general practitioners and patients. The non-prescription pad was the best perceived tool. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04562571.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   Primary care clinicians? perceptions about antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis: a qualitative study [J].
Dempsey, Patrick P. ;
Businger, Alexandra C. ;
Whaley, Lauren E. ;
Gagne, Joshua J. ;
Linder, Jeffrey A. .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 15
[12]   Antimicrobial Stewardship in Outpatient Settings: A Systematic Review [J].
Drekonja, Dimitri M. ;
Filice, Gregory A. ;
Greer, Nancy ;
Olson, Andrew ;
MacDonald, Roderick ;
Rutks, Indulis ;
Wilt, Timothy J. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (02) :142-152
[13]   How can we improve antibiotic prescribing in primary care? [J].
Dyar, Oliver J. ;
Beovic, Bojana ;
Vlahovic-Palcevski, Vera ;
Verheij, Theo ;
Pulcini, Celine .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2016, 14 (04) :403-413
[14]   'I don't know if we can really, really change that': a qualitative exploration of public perception towards antibiotic resistance in France [J].
Essilini, Anais ;
Kivits, Joelle ;
Caron, Frederic ;
Boivin, Jean-Marc ;
Thilly, Nathalie ;
Pulcini, Celine .
JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2020, 2 (03)
[15]  
Fainzang S., 2001, Medicaments et societe
[16]  
Giry M, 2016, MED MALADIES INFECT, V46, P276, DOI [10.1016/j.medmal.2016.02.001, 10.1016/j.medmal.2]
[17]   Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Vogt, TM ;
Boles, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (09) :1322-1327
[18]   Advances in optimizing the prescription of antibiotics in outpatient settings [J].
King, Laura M. ;
Fleming-Dutra, Katherine E. ;
Hicks, Lauri A. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 363
[19]   The viral prescription pad-a mixed methods study to determine the need for and utility of an educational tool for antimicrobial stewardship in primary health care [J].
Lee, Christine ;
Jafari, Maryam ;
Brownbridge, Regan ;
Phillips, Casey ;
Vanstone, Jason R. .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (01)
[20]   A systematic review of parent and clinician views and perceptions that influence prescribing decisions in relation to acute childhood infections in primary care [J].
Lucas, Patricia J. ;
Cabral, Christie ;
Hay, Alastair D. ;
Horwood, Jeremy .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2015, 33 (01) :11-20