Biocontrol of tomato wilt by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

被引:155
|
作者
Guo, JH [1 ]
Qi, HY
Guo, YH
Ge, HL
Gong, LY
Zhang, LX
Sun, PH
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Plant Protect, Dept Plant Pathol, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[2] Agr Technol Stn, Nanjing 210038, Peoples R China
关键词
Bacillus sp; Serratia sp; Pseudomonas sp; Ralstonia solanacearuin; bacterial wilt; Lycoperscion esculentum; biological control; PGPR strains; conservation; living bacteria; population;
D O I
10.1016/S1049-9644(03)00124-5
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In greenhouse experiments, three strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), Serratia sp. J2, fluorescent pseudomonad J3, and Bacillus sp. BB11, were evaluated for biological control of bacterial wilt of tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. A total of four field trials were conducted, each in a different location in Jiangsu and the Hebei provinces. Strains J2, J3, and BB11 provided disease control and increased yield. In trial one in Qixia (1999), disease was reduced 66.1, 73.6, and 68.4% by J2, J3, and BB11, respectively, compared to the control. Yield increases with bacteria in this trial ranged from 49.5 to 70.8%. In trial two in Huaian (2000), disease was reduced 78.1, 94.1, and 86.9% by J2, J3, and BB11, respectively. Yield increases ranged from 180 to 237%. In trial three in Handan (1999), biocontrol efficiencies of 71.3, 63.6, and 78.2% were achieved by J2, J3, and BB11, respectively. Yield increases ranged from 53.5 to 76.2%. In trial 4 in Handan (2000), disease was reduced 74.4, 75.1, and 81.9% by J2, J3, and BB11, respectively, compared to the control. Yield increases with these bacteria ranged from 46.3 to 78.5%. Additional tests were conducted with 1-year-old and 2-year-old formulations of each PGPR strain. Populations of PGPR in the 1-year-old formulations were nearly identical to freshly prepared PGPR formulations. Biological control efficacy was retained by the stored formulations of all three PGPR strains, with 1-year-old formulations providing 68.4-99.5% control and 2-year-old formulations providing 63.4-78.5% control. Yield increases with stored formulations ranged from 35.4 to 67.0%. We conclude that our method of formulating PGPR products provides stable formulations that retain biological control and plant growth-promoting activities. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 72
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Activity of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPRs) in the Biocontrol of Tomato Fusarium Wilt
    Boukerma, Lamia
    Benchabane, Messaoud
    Charif, Ahmed
    Khelifi, Lakhdar
    PLANT PROTECTION SCIENCE, 2017, 53 (02) : 78 - 84
  • [2] Biological Control of Fusarium Wilt in Tomato by Plant Growth-Promoting Yeasts and Rhizobacteria
    Abo-Elyousr, Kamal A. M.
    Mohamed, Hashem M.
    PLANT PATHOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 25 (02): : 199 - 204
  • [3] Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Biocontrol of Tomato Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia solanacearum
    Mekonnen, Habtamu
    Kibret, Mulugeta
    Assefa, Fassil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2022, 2022
  • [4] Plant Growth-Promoting Fungi as Biocontrol Tool against Fusarium Wilt Disease of Tomato Plant
    Attia, Mohamed S.
    Abdelaziz, Amer M.
    Al-Askar, Abdulaziz A.
    Arishi, Amr A.
    Abdelhakim, Ahmed M.
    Hashem, Amr H.
    JOURNAL OF FUNGI, 2022, 8 (08)
  • [5] Towards biocontrol of ophiostomatoid fungi by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Devkota, Pratima
    Kloepper, Joseph W.
    Enebak, Scott A.
    Eckhardt, Lori G.
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 19 - 32
  • [6] Nanoparticles and biochar with adsorbed plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria alleviate Fusarium wilt damage on tomato and watermelon
    Pavlicevic, Milica
    Elmer, Wade
    Zuverza-Mena, Nubia
    Abdelraheem, Wael
    Patel, Ravikumar
    Dimkpa, Christian
    O'Keefe, Tana
    Haynes, Christy L.
    Pagano, Luca
    Caldara, Marina
    Marmiroli, Marta
    Maestri, Elena
    Marmiroli, Nelson
    White, Jason C.
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 203
  • [7] Biocontrol of Meloidogyne javanica by Rhizobium and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on lentil
    Zaki A. Siddiqui
    G. Baghel
    M. S. Akhtar
    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 23 : 435 - 441
  • [8] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents
    Beneduzi, Anelise
    Ambrosini, Adriana
    Passaglia, Luciane M. P.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (04) : 1044 - 1051
  • [9] Proposal for the division of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria into two classifications: Biocontrol-PGPB (Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria) and PGPB
    Bashan, Y
    Holguin, G
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 30 (8-9): : 1225 - 1228
  • [10] Biocontrol potential of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria against plant disease and insect pest
    Jian, Qinhao
    Zhang, Tongrui
    Wang, Yingying
    Guan, Li
    Li, Linlin
    Wu, Longna
    Chen, Shiyan
    He, Yumei
    Huang, Hong
    Tian, Shugang
    Tang, Hu
    Lu, Litang
    ANTONIE VAN LEEUWENHOEK INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL AND MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 117 (01):