Do oil-price shocks predict the realized variance of US REITs?

被引:16
作者
Bonato, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
Cepni, Oguzhan [3 ,4 ]
Gupta, Rangan [5 ]
Pierdzioch, Christian [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Econ & Econometr, Auckland Pk, South Africa
[2] IPAG Business Sch, 184 Blvd St Germain, F-75006 Paris, France
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Econ, Porceloenshaven 16A, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[4] Cent Bank Republ Turkey, Haci Bayram Mah Istiklal Cad 10, TR-06050 Ankara, Turkey
[5] Univ Pretoria, Dept Econ, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[6] Helmut Schmidt Univ, Dept Econ, Holstenhofweg 85,POB 700822, D-22008 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Oil price; Shocks; REITs; Realized variance; Forecasting; ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS; LONG-MEMORY; POLICY UNCERTAINTY; DIVERSIFICATION BENEFITS; VOLATILITY; RETURNS; MODELS; IMPACT; GARCH; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105689
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine, using aggregate and sectoral U.S. data for the period 2008-2020, the predictive power of disentangled oil-price shocks for Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) realized market variance via the heterogeneous auto-regressive realized variance (HAR-RV) model. In-sample tests show that demand and financial-market-risk shocks contribute to a larger extent to the overall fit of the model than supply shocks, where the in-sample transmission of the impact of the shocks mainly operates through their significant effects on realized upward ("good") variance. Out-of-sample tests corroborate the significant predictive value of demand and financial-market-risk shocks for realized variance and its upward counterpart at a short, medium, and long forecast horizon, for various recursive-estimation windows, for realized volatility (that is, the square root of realized variance), for a shorter sub-sample period that excludes the recent phase of exceptionally intense oil-market turbulence, and for an extended benchmark model that features realized higher-order moments, realized jumps, and a leverage effect as control variables. We also study a quantiles-based extension of the HAR-RV model, and we analyze the economic benefits of using shocks for realized-variance forecasting.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Ajmi A.N., 2014, FRONTIERS FINANCE EC, V12, P56
[2]   Real estate returns predictability revisited: novel evidence from the US REITs market [J].
Akinsomi, Omokolade ;
Aye, Goodness C. ;
Babalos, Vassilios ;
Economou, Fotini ;
Gupta, Rangan .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 51 (03) :1165-1190
[3]   Does realized skewness predict the cross-section of equity returns? [J].
Amaya, Diego ;
Christoffersen, Peter ;
Jacobs, Kris ;
Vasquez, Aurelio .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 118 (01) :135-167
[4]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[5]   Dynamic Comovements Between Housing and Oil Markets in the US over 1859 to 2013: a Note [J].
Antonakakis N. ;
Gupta R. ;
Muteba Mwamba J.W. .
Atlantic Economic Journal, 2016, 44 (3) :377-386
[6]   Dynamic spillovers of oil price shocks and economic policy uncertainty [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Chatziantoniou, Ioannis ;
Filis, George .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 44 :433-447
[8]  
Barndorff-Nielsen O.E., 2010, VOLATILITY TIME SERI
[9]  
Barndorff-Nielsen OE., 2004, J Financ Econ, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBH001, 10.1093/jjfinec/nbh001]
[10]  
Barndorff-Nielsen OleE., 2006, Journal of financial Econometrics, V4, p1. 1, DOI [DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBI022, 10.1093/jjfinec/nbi022]