Improvement of the 15N gas flux method for in situ measurement of soil denitrification and its product stoichiometry

被引:24
作者
Well, Reinhard [1 ]
Burkart, Stefan [1 ]
Giesemann, Anette [1 ]
Grosz, Balazs [1 ]
Koester, Jan Reent [1 ]
Lewicka-Szczebak, Dominika [1 ]
机构
[1] Thunen Inst Climate Smart Agr, Bundesallee 65, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
MASS-SPECTROMETRIC ANALYSIS; GROSS N2O PRODUCTION; NITROUS-OXIDE; N-2; ACETYLENE; DINITROGEN; EMISSIONS; SYSTEM; SIGNATURES; MICROCOSM;
D O I
10.1002/rcm.8363
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Rationale Field measurement of denitrification in agricultural ecosystems using the N-15 gas flux method has been limited by poor sensitivity because current isotope ratio mass spectrometry is not precise enough to detect low N-15(2) fluxes in the presence of a high atmospheric N-2 background. For laboratory studies, detection limits are improved by incubating soils in closed systems and under N-2-depleted atmospheres. Methods We developed a new procedure to conduct the N-15 gas flux method suitable for field application using an artificially N-2-depleted atmosphere to improve the detection limit at the given precision of mass spectrometry. Laboratory experiments with and without N-15-labelling and using different flushing strategies were conducted to develop a suitable field method. Subsequently, this method was tested in the field and results were compared with those obtained from the conventional N-15 gas flux method. Results Results of the two methods were in close agreement showing that the denitrification rates determined were not biased by the flushing procedure. Best sensitivity for N-2 + N2O fluxes was 10 ppb, which was 80-fold better than that of the reference method. Further improvement can be achieved by lowering the N-2 background concentration below the values established in the present study. Conclusions In view of this progress in sensitivity, the new method will be suitable to measure denitrification dynamics in the field beyond peak events.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 448
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[2]   FIELD-EVALUATION OF 4 METHODS FOR MEASURING DENITRIFICATION [J].
AULAKH, MS ;
DORAN, JW ;
MOSIER, AR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1991, 55 (05) :1332-1338
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Acetylene blockage technique leads to underestimation of denitrification rates in oxic soils due to scavenging of intermediate nitric oxide [J].
Bollmann, A ;
Conrad, R .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1997, 29 (07) :1067-1077
[5]   Enhancement by acetylene of the decomposition of nitric oxide in soil [J].
Bollmann, A ;
Conrad, R .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1997, 29 (07) :1057-1066
[6]   Fluxes of N2 and N2O and contributing processes in summer after grassland renewal and grassland conversion to maize cropping on a Plaggic Anthrosol and a Histic Gleysol [J].
Buchen, Caroline ;
Lewicka-Szczebak, Dominika ;
Fuss, Roland ;
Helfrich, Mirjam ;
Flessa, Heinz ;
Well, Reinhard .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 101 :6-19
[7]   Soil core method for direct simultaneous determination of N2 and N2O emissions from forest soils [J].
Butterbach-Bahl, K ;
Willibald, G ;
Papen, H .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2002, 240 (01) :105-116
[8]   Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? [J].
Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus ;
Baggs, Elizabeth M. ;
Dannenmann, Michael ;
Kiese, Ralf ;
Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Sophie .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 368 (1621)
[9]   Soil N2O fluxes and related processes in laboratory incubations simulating ammonium fertilizer depots [J].
Deppe, Marianna ;
Well, Reinhard ;
Giesemann, Anette ;
Spott, Oliver ;
Flessa, Heinz .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2017, 104 :68-80
[10]   Impact of CULTAN fertilization with ammonium sulfate on field emissions of nitrous oxide [J].
Deppe, Marianna ;
Well, Reinhard ;
Kuecke, Martin ;
Fuss, Roland ;
Giesemann, Anette ;
Flessa, Heinz .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 219 :138-151