Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure for beginners to perform: experience from 1948 cases

被引:9
作者
Lee, Gyeo Ra [1 ]
Kim, Ji Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Chang Hyun [1 ]
Lee, Yoon Suk [2 ]
Kim, Jin Jo [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 665,Bupyung 6 Dong, Incheon 403720, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, 222 Banpo Daero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2021年 / 35卷 / 06期
关键词
Appendectomy; SILS appendectomy; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery; ONE-TROCAR APPENDECTOMY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-07744-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIL-A) has recently become an option for treating appendicitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and surgical outcomes of SIL-A by residents and surgeons during the learning period. Methods A total of 1948 consecutive patients who underwent SIL-A from May 2008 to November 2014 were studied retrospectively. Surgeries were performed by residents and eight surgeons. Prior to the first case, surgeons and residents had been trained in a training protocol during the learning period. Three initial cases of SIL-A were performed under the supervision of experienced surgeons. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (learning period,n = 483), the first 40 cases by each surgeon and resident; and group 2 (experienced period,n = 1465), cases after the 40th procedure performed by each surgeon. Surgical results were compared between the two groups by performing propensity score matching analysis. Results After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in patient demographics and characteristics of appendicitis between the two groups. The operating time was longer in group 1 than in group 2 (45.3 +/- 18.0vs.33.9 +/- 16.1 min,p < 0.001). The morbidity rate (7.0% vs. 6.5%,p = 0.795) was similar between the two groups. Readmission rate (2.1% vs. 1.3%,p = 0.414) and reoperation rate (0.8% vs. 0.8%,p = 0.348) were also similar between the two groups. However, the rate of incisional hernia occurrence (0.6% vs. 0%,p = 0.066) tended to be larger in group 1 than in group 2 without showing a significant difference. Conclusion SIL-A is a technically feasible and safe procedure when it is performed by residents and surgeons during learning period under an appropriate training protocol. However, residents and surgeons in the learning period should perform it carefully to prevent incisional hernias.
引用
收藏
页码:2997 / 3002
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis: A Comparison with Open Appendectomy
    Katsuno, Goutaro
    Nagakari, Kunihiko
    Yoshikawa, Seiichiro
    Sugiyama, Kazuyoshi
    Fukunaga, Masaki
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 33 (02) : 208 - 214
  • [12] Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy
    Kim, Ji Hoon
    Kim, Ho Young
    Park, Sung Kyun
    Lee, Jung Sun
    Heo, Dong Sik
    Park, Sang Wook
    Lee, Yoon Suk
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (06) : 1054 - 1058
  • [13] Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
    Lee, Won-Suk
    Choi, Sang Tae
    Lee, Jung Nam
    Kim, Keon Kug
    Park, Yeon Ho
    Lee, Woon Kee
    Baek, Jeong-Heum
    Lee, Tae-Hoon
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (02) : 214 - 218
  • [14] Safety and efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for appendectomies: A meta-analysis
    Li, Ping
    Chen, Zong-Hui
    Li, Qing-Guo
    Qiao, Tang
    Tian, You-Yong
    Wang, Dao-Rong
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (25) : 4072 - 4082
  • [15] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis
    Lin, Heng-Fu
    Wn, Jiann-Ming
    Tseng, Li-Ming
    Chen, Kuo-Hsin
    Huang, Shih-Horng
    Lai, I-Rue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (06) : 906 - 910
  • [16] One-trocar appendectomy - Some more sense
    Ng, WT
    Tse, S
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (07): : 1162 - 1163
  • [17] Comparison of Appendectomy Outcomes Between Senior General Surgeons and General Surgery Residents
    Siam, Baha
    Al-Kurd, Abbas
    Simanovsky, Natalia
    Awesat, Haitham
    Cohn, Yahav
    Helou, Brigitte
    Eid, Ahmed
    Mazeh, Haggi
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (07) : 679 - 685
  • [18] Short- and Long-Term Results of Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
    Swank, H. A.
    Eshuis, E. J.
    Henegouwen, M. I. van Berge
    Bemelman, W. A.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (06) : 1221 - 1226
  • [19] A case-controlled comparison of single-site access versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy
    Teoh, Anthony Yuen Bun
    Chiu, Philip Wai Yan
    Wong, Tiffany Cho Lam
    Wong, Simon Kin Hung
    Lai, Paul Bo San
    Ng, Enders Kwok Wai
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (05): : 1415 - 1419
  • [20] Comparison of Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy in Management of Uncomplicated and Complicated Appendicitis
    Tiwari, Manish M.
    Reynoso, Jason F.
    Tsang, Albert W.
    Oleynikov, Dmitry
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (06) : 927 - 932